This is directed at those who voted for Bush and are unhappy with the outcome of the last 3 years.
If there was a Mulligan , a do over, of that election, would you change your vote. Or do you think things would be considerably worse if the other guy had won in 04?
2007-11-09 00:51:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am happy with my vote and would do it all over again. I believe that history will judge Bush 43 well.
2007-11-09 01:04:44 · answer #1 · answered by KRR 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No I wouldn't. John Kerry would have been 100 times worse than President Bush. Pres. Bush was defiantly the lesser of 2 evils.
2007-11-09 01:35:59 · answer #2 · answered by The Man from Nowhere 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i have not seen one reason to change my vote because when i cast it, it was with a heavy heart and i knew that this was the tough decision that had to be made. we americans, i think, have become spoiled. we don't see the people in the rest of the world who would give their left arm to have the security we have. places where your child could be slaughtered just for going to school, as if it was nothing. where your grandmother might be hosed by an ak-47 while shopping for food. where your brother or sister might be drug from your house kicking and screaming in the middle of the night, never to be seen alive again. spoiled children. places where your worst urban american nightmare looks like a romp through disneyland.
2007-11-09 01:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not unless in that magical turning back time thing the Dems nominated someone other than John Kerry.
And if it was Bush running again in 2008 against Obama or Hillary, I'd still vote for him.
2007-11-09 01:09:24 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
This explains the problem in America today. Today are the same supporters that supported the past failures in history just different names. Talk to those who where under the "thumb" of dictators and mad men and they still rally support, it has to do with a psychological failure also.
2007-11-09 01:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by edubya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope, think as bad as things are now they would be even worse if Kerry were President. Do not agree with many of the things Bush as done and is doing but still believe he was the better of the two choices, possibly I'm in denial.
2007-11-09 01:10:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Nope. Because if Kerry can't keep control of a simple little speech and allow the electrocution of some student. Imagine him trying to control a country. Not to mention his constant downgrading of military. This is why a lot of people do not like Hillary. Her constant anti-military speeches, on top of many other things, but a lot do not like her downgrading of the military.
2007-11-09 01:09:08 · answer #7 · answered by Fallen 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No
Reason- John Kerry
2007-11-09 01:06:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I voted for GWB in the general election and wouldn't change it.
Reason = Kerry
2007-11-09 01:11:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Im only dissappointed at the border situation, but he never promised us a rose garden
2007-11-09 01:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋