Indian cricket team has the worst bowling line as compare to the other major cricket playing country.
Could not defend the 321 runs on the seaming Mohali pitch.
Support your answers
2007-11-08 18:21:30 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
There is no reason to differ with you
Really India produced only one great bowler KAPIL
..........................v
2007-11-09 01:48:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you!
The bowlers we have are very good no paper, we have th best bowling side on paper but in reality we don't have, we need some one like, Mcgrath, Brat Lee, Wasim Akram, Vaas, Walsh, Pollock these are the best bowler. The bowling coach is also not impressive when we was playing.
Believe or not we need one full time BATTER coach , very good bowling coach and very good manager. We are appointing the manager who used to play 20-30 years back, and today cricket has changed like anything. We need some one can control the players and if some one can't perform, the shouldn't be in the team. Management should create some sort of insecurity to each player like, if you don't do well, you are out of the team regard less what was your performs in the past.
2007-11-09 13:16:07 · answer #2 · answered by Saurav 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you.
We have the best batting line-up but also the worst bowling line-up.
It was a terrible effort with the ball from Indian team. Though Pakistani bowlers also bowled poorly but they came back in final overs.
On the other hand, our bowlers were just nothing.
The reason India lost the match was bcz Indian bowlers were defending rather than attacking.
And they say, fortune favours the brave. Our bowlers were not brave enough to attack the opposition batsmen & that's why we lost a great opportunity.
This is a great game. It all depends upon performance. India performed better in game 1 & Pakiatan played well in game./
Bowling at depth is our biggest problem & we need 6to solve it as quickly as possible.
No doubt, India is better than Pakistan at the moment but anything can happen.
We need some quality chuckers in our team
2007-11-08 18:32:34 · answer #3 · answered by The Great Montitude 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I agree with you totally.
I see that cricket is played in nearly every gully in India. We have many learning in coaching camps, we are crazy about cricket. But what is the use if we cannot produce 4-5 bowlers out of crores of cricket players. I think it is useless to learn cricket.
We have out of crores some bowlers who cannot control their line and length. Who cannot bowl Fast. Take wickets, they are playing like amateurs.
Australia produces many many bowlers out of few cricket learners.
2007-11-08 18:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by The Ranger 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you
The bowlers did not bowl well and conceded too many extras The bowling line up was weak and they did not bowl well
The economy rate was also not under control
2007-11-08 21:22:20 · answer #5 · answered by Deoxys 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are currently no great bowling attacks in the world, West Indies and Bangladesh are both worse.
2007-11-09 00:44:06 · answer #6 · answered by JP 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes... Our bowling is very poor... All are concentrating on wickets rather than run control... If Murali karthik was there in yesterday's match , something good may have happened...
2007-11-08 18:51:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah!!! They need a stronger bowling line up that does not give extras...
2007-11-08 18:58:33 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I agree with you guy.
They are not involving into cricket other than to get maney.
2007-11-08 18:45:39 · answer #9 · answered by hari 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree
2007-11-08 22:17:23 · answer #10 · answered by Atul 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No..i dont
australia's bowling is weakest
all big chases are against aussies....
2007-11-08 18:58:52 · answer #11 · answered by Neil 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋