English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The President supposed to do the will of the people. The Polls clearly indicate that he is not doing that. Nobody wants the war. Nobody wants the shitty economy we have. George Bush is doing what he wants to do. How in the Hell did he ever get elected. Corruption, That's how. Impeach George Bush and his sidekick Cheney. They are both corrupt arrogant criminals. Anyone agree?

2007-11-08 17:54:37 · 18 answers · asked by Michael P 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Bush is selling the blood or America's children to a war machine owned by foreign investors. What he is doing is trying to out order to the world. Hitler had the same idea.

2007-11-09 18:25:41 · update #1

18 answers

Yeah

2007-11-08 18:09:33 · answer #1 · answered by Nicey 4 · 4 7

No, I don't agree. By impeaching those two our nation will not get anywhere. What needs to happen is all of the people responsible for the Iraq War should be brought up on charges and indicted!

We need to set our nation upright once again and then at that point everything will go well. Including the coming of a good President in China, someone who is thoughtful of the well-being of others and seeing that men of all nations are served. Hopefully, China's next President, who resides in the US is not killed . . . or defamed by the Bush administration.

Is George W. Bush the worst President in US history. If people knew the truth of this Iraq War and knew everything that went on behind the scenes, they would have to agree that President George W. Bush is the worst President in US history.
.

2007-11-08 23:17:16 · answer #2 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 0 0

all and sundry of your factors has a clean advantageous word to it. Or on the selection least, has substitute little sinse the Reagan administration. C'mon, job loss ? Lowest and maximum non-end unemployment trend (at present 4.7%) because 1982 the place it approached 10%. infrequently considerable. you have fallen into the thick media fog. don't be a trifling sheep, persist with alongside blindly, and make contributions to the misrepresentation. you have a private accountability to look into this your self and clean away the mist and shed mild on the actually certainty of issues. in case you think of the media isn't biased against each thing Bush, your unsuitable.

2016-09-28 21:22:37 · answer #3 · answered by wrights 4 · 0 0

I use to think of US as a desirable country, with the best resources in the world. It is the most powerful (supposedly) country in the world, no?

Until he came onboard.

Look at America now. The dollar is weakening, the economy is not rosy either, it is no longer secure and above all, the impression given by the media is, the country is not moving forward. It is just stagnant.

So, I think he suck big time as president.

2007-11-08 18:23:10 · answer #4 · answered by asianprincess 2 · 3 1

He's doing what needs to be done. Do you really want America to become like Israel with a bomb randomly going off every week ?
You want to complain about corruption and not doing the will of the people ? where is your whining over Congress ? The congress has the democratic majority, those are your people and they have failed to defund the war in 55 separate resolutions. Theyve been so busing politicizing every issue and bashing Bush that they haven't accomplished anything...except for passing the minimum wage increase.
This has become nothing more than a political war. Mr. Bush is doing what he thinks needs to be done for the future of the country , meanwhile your leftist party hasn't been doing anything at all except lying to the American people and trying to re-establish their power base.
Lets talk corruptions.... How about Peloski's war....undermining the Government with visits to terrorist nations. As speaker of the House that isn't her job. And i'd bet all those trips were at tax payer expense.
What about hillary getting a $200k donation from a family who's only making $46k as a letter cairrier ? Along with Mr. Suee co sponsoring her fund raisers...but she claims she never heard of the man. Yet this chinese nationalist has given much to her election campaign.
Lets talk about how the Alternative Minimum Tax is screwing 3 million americans and generating 65 billion in ill gotten tax money the Government isn't entitled to. That was Democratic legislation. Next year if not fixed, it will ensnare 20 million. Senator Rangle wants to fix it now...because its an election year. Not to fix it permanently.
Gee, I could go on and on. I'm not saying the republicans are perfect, but at least they aren't wasting my time...the people's time..chasing frivolous political agenda's They aren't lying to me from the floor of the senate. They aren't plannign on messing up the economy with tax increases.
If your supposed poles showed what you claim they do, then the war would be over because Congress holds the purse strings and its controlled by the democrats.
If you want in impune the President with such lacking detail, wrong facts and emotional dribble, you'll have to do better than that. The presidents job is to protect the people, its congress's and the House's job to do the will of the people because they are all representatives. The president is the leader of a nation, not a puppet to do what people tell him. He does as he see's fit for the better of the nation.
Where's your critisizm of Jimmy Carter for enpowering a terrorist regiem like Iran ?
Look up your history, there are Presidents with lower approval ratings than Bush, and I might add that Congress's hit a low of 9% themselves.
Be frustrated, sure, one time or another we all get that way, but I'd say the left needs to learn a little respect and hold their tongue till they have learned the facts. not that propoganda liberal media.

2007-11-08 18:13:03 · answer #5 · answered by Nightwind 7 · 3 4

Fff

2017-01-22 04:29:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes. worst president ever, i would agree although i wasn't around for all of them. this guy is the most incompetent, least intelligent person we could have. a monkey could do better. a rock could do better.

i will tell you how he got elected. it's pretty simple. the first time was obviously a fluke and a backlash against clinton's final years, and of course the stupid voting irregularities and supreme court bs. the second time can be summed up by the cover story on the london daily mirror dated thursday november 4, 2004: "How can 59,017,382 people be so DUMB?" i have it framed as a reminder of how little intelligence our country has collectively. people were all hypnotized by a systematically manufactured swarm of fear. not enough people can think for themselves. not enough people really care.

kind of like how religious people fear god so they succumb to their brainwashing. how silly.

2007-11-08 18:16:08 · answer #7 · answered by inter13 2 · 2 4

Yes, a few historians have weighed in already, and this greatly peeved Bush. Here are a couple of short opinions from historians.

"He's the worst ever"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120101509.html

"Move over Hoover" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/01/AR2006120101511.html

2007-11-08 18:12:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

1.) You are ignorant about the current state of the US economy. I suggest that you better educate yourself.

2.) Americans are divided on the war. In general, a third want us to get tougher, a third want us to get out, and a third don't know. It's not honest to say "two thirds disagree on the war," because many of those people want it fought HARDER, not more softly.

3.) George Bush was elected the first time because most states voted for him. He got elected the second time because most states voted for him again. Since we use the electoral college system (and have for the past 200-odd years), the state vote trumps the popular vote on the rare occasions that there's a mismatch. If you actually research the 2000 election (which it is obvious that you have not done), you'll quickly see that Al Gore was more eager to violate law to get elected than George Bush was.

2007-11-08 18:07:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 7

Yes. Though I do admire the ability of the administration to change definitions of words and get all of their sheeple to accept the new ones. If I could pull that off at work..well, lets just say things would finally get interesting! Does anyone think we would have this drawn out war if we were paying for it now...could you just imagine trying to sell war bonds for this ****?

2007-11-08 18:06:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Dude is there a better way of saying YES to this question?

2007-11-08 18:49:32 · answer #11 · answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers