I don't think Hillary should be the one taking the lead, I think it should be John Edwards =/
2007-11-08 17:42:58 · 11 answers · asked by just_me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I don't have anything against Hillary, if it comes down to her being the candidate from the democratic party then I'll definetely vote for her. I just support John Edwards more and he has never backed down from anything that he has said. I like his views on things. It's nothing against Hillary, I think the Clintons are great.
2007-11-09 11:07:47 · update #1
If Obama wasn't running, Edwards would be my next choice. I'm hoping if Obama wins in the primaries he'll pick Edwards as his running mate.
OBAMA / EDWARDS '08
2007-11-08 17:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am really confused. Hillary is bright, focused, works within the system, a fiscal conservative but a social progressive. She can get consensus on both sides of issues, graduated top of her class, self made millionaire, outstanding lawyer and whiz at getting things done. She's a woman, so will do an excellent job with something to prove and she was a very participatory member of the White House team in the best 8 year run we've had in this country in the last 60 years. The Clinton team reduced the deficit, was great at foreign policy, took care of our environment...seriously I don't get it. Is it because she's a woman? Who cares? Dick Cheney would never had made her like he did John Edwards in the VP debates 4 years ago...Is it because John Edwards is cute?
Please help me understand why clearly the best presidential candidate is considered "not the best choice" by so many people! You don't have to respond, because it'll be like everyone else: "I dunno."
The only thing you could possibly say about her is her husband had some affairs, and they are still together. Guess what - News Flash - She already knew. She doesn't care. Hillary was only bummed that everyone else found out, because Bill pushed the envelope. So what? What does that have to do with running this country? Actually, the only reason everyone found out was because Newt Gingrich told the special prosectuer to go after him on that because they couldn't find anything wrong with the guy. That's right - Whitewater was no scandal, except as a mouthpiece for the GOP to rant about.
The Clinton's are fantastic. I can't believe this is even worth a debate. We should be begging them as a country to get back at the helm and fix everthing that the thieves of the 2000 and 2004 elections have done in their era of incompetence and corruption.
Know what I mean?
2007-11-08 18:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I am for Ron Paul because he supports the constitution. He want to get rid of useless things that impart on our constitution like DHS, Real ID act, Patriot Act, IRS, and many more things that will help the USA go back to being a TRULY free country. If we elect anyone else we are doomed. And as far as the abortion ideology, he has said leave it up to the state governments not the national government. He just said personally he doesn't agree with it. He is America's only hope for true freedom.
2007-11-10 17:55:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
basically were given up and listened to the documents this morning. The Obama attack must have worked because Edwards has taken the radio classified ads off the air. Edwards speaks hostile to large agency, and so on. and the classified ads were paid for through a huge agency contributor to the marketing campaign at the same time as Edwards changed into operating for vice chairman. So i wager Edwards agreed. He doesn't favor to be considered a hypocrite and that i do not extremely imagine that he's. I assume him to do extra positive in Iowa than maximum individuals imagine he will. i have continuously said that Hillary and Obama are going to proceed their bickering and Edwards is going to slide in at the same time as they are asleep and thieve Iowa.
2016-10-23 21:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a democrat. but he's a million times better than Hillary.
2007-11-08 17:51:18 · answer #5 · answered by irmaynerds 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he wasn't so lavish in his lifestyle he wouldn't have a problem. I like him but he needs to do a few thing.
1) Get a hair cut at supercuts on TV.
2) Make his house energy efficient
3) Not be a scum sucking lawyer
Not to mention, he is just too damn pretty.
2007-11-08 17:47:37 · answer #6 · answered by Codynova 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who?
2007-11-08 19:12:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think either one of them should be President.
Rudy Guliani has my vote.
2007-11-08 18:54:28 · answer #8 · answered by Starieberry 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm going for Obama
2007-11-08 17:51:35 · answer #9 · answered by Wubishet 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
lost interest he is too teflon
2007-11-08 17:59:07 · answer #10 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋