how could things be worse than this? if women had been running things all along wouldnt things be better??????
2007-11-08 15:55:50 · 34 answers · asked by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I agree! Although I am voting for Hillary not just because she is a woman but because she is the best candidate for the job.
Hillary/2008
2007-11-08 15:59:53 · answer #1 · answered by Libby 6 · 4⤊ 13⤋
No because she does not offer better employment rights and protections to US Citizens.
Condoleezza Rice is worse even though she has many credentials and is intelligent she has never applied them and is a BOLD-FACED liar as Hillary Rodham-Clinton.
If you are serious about the destruction of the US Constitution and how the Declaration of Independence then take your time in reading them.
The Democrats and Republicans lie to stay in power-http://www.friesian.com/ross/ca40/
With the exception of Ron Paul, Republican and former Libertarian, and Dennis Kucinich, Democrats, Americans will be catered to so the best liar will win.
http://www.friesian.com/ross/
http://www.fija.org/
http://www.lp.org/
Barry Goldwater was a Conservative Libertarian while McCain is a Faux Libertarian and Faux Goldwater admirer.
The true Axis-of-Evil are, Democrats, Republicans, and powerful rich white men.
Like Bart Simpson say's "Damn if you and damn if you don't"
Union and Non-Union are corrupt, but the Union is still better since they offer some protections from At-Will employment.
2007-11-09 04:39:17 · answer #2 · answered by MIE 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Things would be better if women ran things, just NOT THAT WOMAN.
2007-11-09 20:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by 1sleepymama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not like Hillary. It is not because she is a woman. I would vote for a woman in a heartbeat if her views best fit me. Her views do not match mine.
2007-11-11 08:06:06 · answer #4 · answered by coho51 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it possible that you are blinded to her complete lack of character because she is a woman?
Perhaps it is not the people that won't vote for her that are the ones with prejudices. Maybe you are the one that is giving her a pass for the coverup of the entire "cattle futures" incident, the fact that she was the only principal of Whitewater that didn't go to jail, had FBI files in her possession illegally for years, has changed her position often on Iraq, has less than skillfully avoided taking a position on Immigration, wanted to Socialize the entire medical industry and probably still does but won't reveal her plans....
anyway, maybe you're the one that has problems seeing past gender.
2007-11-08 16:11:15 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Being a woman has nothing to do with my intense dislike of the woman. I like Condi Rice. I would, however, not vote for Hillary for anything in the world.
2007-11-08 16:17:26 · answer #6 · answered by Eyes Wide Open 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
That anti-clinton narrative, as fueled by the beltway press,
has been in play for 15 years now. that talking point is so
prevalent, grade school kids could probably recite it. but
pundits claim it is suddenly going to change everything.
2007-11-08 16:09:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
It's not the sex or race that makes a good politician it is the ideology and the individual. What you are using is a copout.
2007-11-08 16:07:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
They don't hate her just because she's a woman. They hated her husband just as much, just as irrationally. They made up lies about him and still do, accusing him of murder, drug-dealing, treason, rape, just whatever bad things they could think of. Why wouldn't they hate Hillary for the same selfish, self-deceptive reasons?
But her being a woman certainly helps!
2007-11-08 16:07:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
I don't like Hillary because everything she does is for herself, including staying married to Bill Clinton who has been cheating on her since both were college students.
If Condi Rice were running for president, I would vote for her.
2007-11-08 17:14:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
No, not because she is a woman. She is a woman who stood by a lying, cheating, cowardly husband and repeatedly defended him. She was involved up to her neck in the White Water scandal. She rented an apartment in New York, the most Democratic city next to Holliwierd and ran for senate. She is an opportunist and a person who has absolutely no place in the White House. The democrats will have to do better than her if they are going to win this election...and Obama isn't it either. I have nothing against the man. But, this country is not ready to elect a black leader. I wish we were, but we are not ready. And only because of his lack of national political experience. If you don't know how to play the game in that town, it will eat you and your presidency alive...ask Jimmy Carter or Gerald Ford.
2007-11-08 16:04:08 · answer #11 · answered by Chazman1347 4 · 6⤊ 7⤋