English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i feel he should have been given a chance for the next two matches..but it doesnt matter to me much beacuse rahul has proved with that double century that he is fine nick....and hats off to him for that!!

2007-11-08 15:13:24 · 9 answers · asked by lost... 5 in Sports Cricket

9 answers

We need to forget about those things.

Now, we should look forward.

Rahul will be back. So, all the best to him. Congrats to Anil Kumble on becoming the test captain.

2007-11-08 15:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by The Great Montitude 7 · 2 0

I think the Indian selectors made a so/so decision bc, i think Rahul Dravid is better than Virender Sehwag in batting attacks VS Pakistani bowlers currently bc, Rahul Dravid is always for winning maturity, & judgment of a higher level with experience.

2007-11-08 15:22:54 · answer #2 · answered by Furioso Lion88 5 · 1 1

sure ofcourse !!!!! yet first see what greg had to assert approximately rahul dravid : he's an outstanding cricketer. He has earned the respect of captaining the country. He has an particularly useful ideas-set and robust cricketing ideas. "it is going to be a getting to know curve for him. i understand the 1st few video games are needed," reported Chappell. Dravid has previous adventure interior the placement, having till now captained India in 5 assessments and 17 one-day internationals. effects decrease than Dravid have been average, although, pretty in one-day cricket and he now faces the undertaking of attempting to inspire the team together as holding his very own intense standards with the bat. yet former India captain Ajit Wadkar believes it is a "useful pass" and he reported: "The selectors of course have an eye fixed on the 2007 international Cup." Dravid will income from the return of Sachin Tendulkar, who has been named in a 15-guy squad for the 1st 2 one-dayers against Sri Lanka. Tendulkar has no longer performed international cricket when you consider that April following surgical technique on his elbow however the selectors have desperate he's now extra healthy sufficient to reclaim his place interior the ingredient. "All are equals, yet some are extra equivalent than others," reported Chappell, who has been gazing Tendulkar heavily interior the nets and by using the enjoyed ones Challenger Trophy journey. "there have been very stable signs and warning signs from him. i could desire to work out a turning ingredient in him the place the timing began to bypass. "with a bit of luck it is the beginning up of the return of the Sachin of outdated," Chappell extra. Ganguly and Mohammad Kaif have not been picked for the hollow one-dayers because of the fact of harm and fellow batsman VVS Laxman has been dropped, leaving room for attempt opener Gautam Gambhir to objective and instruct himself interior the shorter form of the sport. The squad contains one newcomer in 22-year-outdated seamer Sree Santh. "we are finding to furnish extra possibilities to promising young babies," reported chief selector Kiran extra. "India has no longer performed too nicely interior the previous 30, 35 one-day internationals. we are finding to the destiny, however the door hasn't been close on incredibly everybody."

2017-01-06 08:48:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

no, never ,...its a fatal mistake which would certainly ,...
backfire.and it is NOT right to leave Rahul out of Indian cricket team, even for a one match,he is the wall after all~

2007-11-08 15:34:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It was right

2007-11-08 22:21:30 · answer #5 · answered by Atul 2 · 0 1

rahul must be included
even for remaining matches he should be included
......................v

2007-11-09 02:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I fully agree with you.

2007-11-08 17:55:32 · answer #7 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2 0

yes, he is now an old lion

2007-11-08 16:17:06 · answer #8 · answered by Paresh P 1 · 0 1

no not at all.

2007-11-08 15:52:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers