We have alot of work to do
1. We have to get our economy back on track.getting dollar value to rise and make up for the money dubya wasted
2.We have to gget back our positive Image by quickly training and arming iraqi army and leaving the country.
3.Get diplomatic relationship with the "rouge states" which Bush try very hard to aviod since it is always his plan to steal more oil
4.Cut diplomatic relation with Israel, and liberate palestine from that illegal state.
5.helping out the less fortunate ppl,eg war veterans and hurrican katrina survivors
2007-11-08 14:24:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Firstly, one man cannot destroy a nation (if that is what you think he has done). He has to have a LOT of supporters and you will have to battle ALL of them. If the majority agree with you, it is not hard at all to create any kind of nation you want but you have to be ORGANIZED. If the majority are NOT with you, it is an impossible task.
Simply replacing one party with another hasn't worked that well in the past because when the the voters are not organized, the elected listen to other voices. There is a model in place for such a non-partisan organization. Write me.
2007-11-08 14:52:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by anteater 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
how hard is it to understand this: you wake up each morning and do the same routine each day, you go to work, you live in an apartment or house, you drive a car or walk, you are able to go anywhere with out fear, you speak English as a first language, you probably never seen a gun before, you drink alcohol, you engage in premarital sex, you are free to do what you will, say what you want, you are FREE! Now, why are you able to do this? Because of our president. Has things changed drastically for you personally since Clinton, since you were born? If anything this nation has improved. Why is it that you liberals form opinions when you don't even know the other side? I look from both perspectives before I react to something. We will need to clean up after Hillary or Obama, but may God never let that happen. Bush did not declare war on Iraq. It was the people you voted for: Congress. Yes, its true. Get your facts right before people laugh at you.
2007-11-08 14:39:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by urmamahunter 1
·
4⤊
3⤋
The question is why the masses of gallons of nerve brokers got here across, incredibly centred organophosphates, which contains chemical warhead artillery rounds crammed with those nerve brokers, have been in simple terms blown off as "pesticides". The "Smoking Gun" replaced into got here across, regardless of if it replaced into written off with the aid of the Bush administration. Why? Is the insect undertaking somewhat so large in Iraq they had to have adequate "pesticide" which, while diluted to pesticide potential, could be adequate to spray the completed u . s . thrice an afternoon for no less than ten years? and somewhat, for the reason that while do you utilize a 75mm or a a hundred and five mm cannon to coach insecticide? Are Iraqi roaches and weevils somewhat that vast? and of direction we can't forget what Hitler used the insecticide Zyklon B for. The Gore kinfolk nevertheless does employer with the bin encumbered kinfolk, so Al Gore would desire to be in on the plot as properly. Bush replaced into additionally warned proper to the gas and propane tankers that have been going for use as bombs on bridges and in site visitors tunnels, the poisons that have been going to be pumped into the water structures. Clinton replaced into additionally warned proper to the assaults, yet scheduled for a distinctive date. Bush replaced into warned proper to the atack on the White abode scheduled for July 4, 2001 as properly. some thing like 3 hundred warnings of that style are available consistent with day. you will desire to have faith that Sarah Brady replaced into inon the 9/11/2001 attack as properly, for the reason that her team, Handgun administration Inc., (Now referred to as the Brady campaign), disarmed the pilots approximately 6 weeks in simple terms before the hijackings.
2016-10-15 13:23:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
From where I sit, you dont really have to do anything. Just follow my simple Iraq war plan and we can be out of there in six months. Then take all that money and put it towards paying off the national debt.
Lowering the debt will bring back strength to the dollar. Granted it will piss off China so Hillary wont ever do it.
2007-11-08 14:22:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Not hard at all. The hardest part will be to get the lazy breeding class to work. How many generations has it been now, sucking off the governments teat? Luckily we didn't get stuck with John jane fonda Kerry. Or Al fat man Gore. That would take some work to recover from.
2007-11-08 16:03:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well, considering how long it will take us to overcome the extreme deficits in the spending budget will by itself take many years. Restoring how we're viewed outside of the country will be a nearly impossible task as well. The amount of work that will be necessary is an almost impossible amount. Hopefully the American people will be up to the challenge.
2007-11-08 14:22:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Razmig 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
The dollar is down to 90 cents of the Canadian, after decades spent at 1.25. It is plunging against every major currency. We will have to work very hard indeed.
2007-11-08 14:21:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
How hard would we have to work if we were fighting Muslim terrorists in our own Country? How hard will we have to work if the Dems pass their new tax increases, still telling the lie that it won't effect the middle class.
2007-11-08 15:09:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
We already work hard. Get our spending under control by voting in a true Conservative.
2007-11-08 14:31:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by GW 1
·
2⤊
2⤋