Her husband, the former President Bill Clinton bested the Republican nut-jobs and they can't stand it.
Clinton, a democrat presided over one of the most prosperous times, eliminated the deficit caused by Regan and was for the most part a good President.
Clinton beat the 1st Bush interrupting a reign of Republican power in the Whitehouse. They wanted it back, tried to destroy him in the process and failed.
Now, Hillary is running and they can't stand it, because just like Bill did, she's going to take it away from them again.
I love it.
Vote Hillary 08
2007-11-08 13:22:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Politics are a system and a science.
sometimes systems like these are refereed to as machines.
In short the political machine is not going to produce any candidate that will make the broad changes we need.
Clinton is the natural opposite of the current administration, but still very much a part of the system as it exists now.
Louisiana has just elected a new governor that is expected to be a break in the trend, we need one of those for the whole country...but none are available and empowered to run for office yet.
2007-11-08 13:22:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by in pain 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of she even is familiar with she is forward in the polls. did no longer she say the different time that she does not rather pay interest to the polls. that's actual regular for her to be forward in the polls ideal from the beginning up. She has have been given a head start up. She is Hillary CLINTON, bear in mind? at the instant she has been slipping down progressively mutually as her warring parties have been gaining on her some. in the weeks forward, issues will shape up extra desirable for us to tell what human beings rather think of roughly her. Votes are extra desirable than polls.
2016-10-01 22:38:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by shakita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trying to steal silverware when she left the Whitehouse comes to mind. But besides that she has really done nothing. In the debates, from what I have heard her say, she is good about saying Bush sucks but has nothing of substance as far as a plan herself. Her approval rating is based on that she does not say anything, every public appearance she does her ratings go down. She is also a panderer so you really have no clue what she will do if elected. The social programs and what not are on a party level (all candidates support) so people who do not like her on those points will not like any dem candidate.
If you look into her past it is shady, she has a history of not being likable and has antagonized her underlings.
2007-11-08 13:21:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
She practically commited treason,when she called for congress to "tie the President's hands" ,in the middle of a war! ...Those who know the truth,understand that the Clintons care more for the U.N. than for America! Her big mouth isn't helping either! She keeps making rediculous promises and accusations to gain support. I think most people see through it. It's an obvious "win at all cost" strategy. Shamefull,really!
2007-11-08 13:55:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by luke_the_duke 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
If you are only 15 and interested in politics already, then you are one smart, inquisitive person!
Here is why people are against Hillary.
First of all, she is a Socialist. At the root of Socialism is the condescending notion that people aren't smart enough to run their own lives. Imagine your parents said, "We don't think you'll be responsible enough to ever drive, so we're going to deny you a drivers license for all your life." Well, that is how Socialists treat "the common people". They think the government knows better. They think the government must protect people from themselves.
Hillary talks about peoples' money like it really belongs to the government, not to them. Can you imagine if your parents came home from work and said, "Oh what a hard day I've had. Thank God that Hillary Clinton has decided to let me keep 60% of my salary. That means I only have to work five months for the government. Yeah, it will be great. After all those miserably cold days in January, February, and March, and those rainy days in April, I just have to work through May and finally I'll have earned a penny that the government will allow me to keep."
Pretty sad, huh?
The reason this is so important is that Socialsist thinking (and Communism) is the ultimate in cynicism. These philosophies and economic models take the position that people aren't smart enough to make the most important decisions in their lives for themselves.
Think about that. Socialists essentially are saying that people never really reach the intellectual level of adulthood, and therefore can't be trusted to make decisions for themselves. Look what (Socialist) Hillary Clinton said:
"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people."
(From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan)
How about Socialists' concept of money? They believe that your money really belongs to the government, and you should be grateful for what the Feds allow you to keep. Read another juice Hillary quote:
"Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush's] tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
(Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; SFGate.com 6/28/2004.)
[By the way, those tax cuts have demonstrably paid for themselves, and then some! That is undeniable. They increased tax revenues much more than what they "lost" in trying to bilk people of their hard earned money]
When your classmates spout Socialist nonsense, you might want to question why they want to ally themselves with the party that gets practically all the votes from the following groups: lazy welfare mommas, drug addicts, pathetic aging hippies, dumb-as-a-rock Hollywood stars who barely graduated High School, along with the even less intelligent ranks of pampered, whining, overpaid NBA, many of whom are lucky to have some athletic ability; otherwise, they would be qualified for nothing except stealing cars and dealing drugs.
Do you watch Bill O'Reilly on Fox News? You can stay one step ahead of everyone by watching his news analysis, and getting information found nowhere else.
Just remember what Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert said about cynicism, the lifeblood of Socialists. Cynicism is a zero sum game. Nothing gets accomplished by people trying to be clever and hip by spouting nihilistic garbage about how the future is bleak and only the government can save us. Just remember the punk movement in the late 1970s with Sid Vicious, and his ilk. They sang about how England was finished, and anyone who believed in the future is just an idiot dreaming.
England is doing better than anyone could have imagined back then. So, who was the smart one? The punk cynics, or Conservatives like Margaret Thatcher who saw a bright future?
Please stay with the Yahoo Politics section. Anyone who is interested in Politics at such a young age obviously has a keen mind. Whatever your political affiliation may turn out to be, we need people like you.
2007-11-08 13:30:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
She doesn't really have a platform. If someone disagrees with her she changes her mind. She's weak, she has spent her whole married life with a cheater and she continues to allow it. She lies and she breaks the law.
It's funny how I know I am on track when I get so many thumbs down. Wow you would think she was your mother guys.
2007-11-08 13:25:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Well do just a little research and you will come up with things like whitewater and travelgate, and these are only scratching the survace.
Hillary is bad news.
2007-11-08 13:20:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by SFC_Ollie 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
What you are reading is called "mudslinging". Just about all candidates do that to sway peoples thinking about other candidates. Another method is called "half truths". That's when part of a statement is true but, the other half is embellished to look negative.
2007-11-08 13:20:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by acedelux 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
Because this is still a male dominated society and they are afraid that a woman will do a better job!
"If you want it done right the first time, ask a woman!"
Edit: Bring on the thumbs down, everyone, you know I'm right! Plus, I don't think she or any other candidate can **** up the presidency as much as Bush has!
'2009...the end of an error!'
2007-11-08 13:18:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Derby Girl 3
·
1⤊
7⤋