English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I can imagine the moveon.org's of the world will flip on this one. Liberals attack regardless of the situation or results. Iraq has shown significant progress yet that is brushed under the rug as liberals turn the screaming up. Why don't we all realize what a monumental challenge the war on terror is and band together, rather than attack George Bush while offering no solid alternatives other than to completely pull out and sit on our heels waiting to be attacked again?

2007-11-08 12:54:51 · 13 answers · asked by Moss's Minions 2 in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

Liberals don't believe in personal responsibility, so there is always someone else to blame.

Examples: African Americans are the vast majority of prisoners in this country. They blame it on racism. Today's youth are more violent today than in previous generations. They blame it on TV rather than parenting. Minorities as a general rule are more poor and less educated than non-minority populations. They blame it on the government. Someone shoots and kills another person, they blame the gun maker.

The list goes on and on. The basic point here is that liberals don't believe in personal responsibility:

why have personal responsibility when you can blame someone else?

2007-11-08 13:03:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

In a manner, sure. I voted for Bush in 2000, and that i did so fortuitously. i'm a average Republican, or a minimum of i became till now each and all the typical Republicans have been given kicked out of workplace and have been replaced by utilising ideal wing extremists. My perspectives have not replaced, yet without warning, i'm a loopy left wing socialist liberal. the middle seems to have shifted below my ft.

2016-10-01 22:37:19 · answer #2 · answered by shakita 4 · 0 0

When you are a figurehead (the president of the USA) you bear the brunt of all criticism. It doesnt matter that congress approved the war, and still approves the funding (that comes from BOTH parties, democrat and republican) What matters is he accepted the title "LEADER" What irks me is all the american citizens who criticise our leader, but are unwilling to make a stand and run for president. Right now there is a clerk in 7-11 who would be a better president than those we have running for office. And that clerk is the first person in his family to be born in the US instead of India!!!!!!

2007-11-08 15:23:33 · answer #3 · answered by Dj_Ez 4 · 1 0

We are showing progress? That is news to me.

I used to support this silly war. I even know people who have been there. They support it...our military is doing a fine job...but the government over there is not making the effort to step up and take charge.

You can't just go over to a country and instill a government on them. It is impossible to do that.

The democrats are acting dumb...but so are the republicans. Our president has done nothing to stop immigration. He has wasted so much money over the past few years. It is time both sides stepped up and worked together.

2007-11-08 13:00:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 3 0

The problem is that liberals know they can't win an argument (or election) on the issues. Their policies just don't hold water. So - they have to make everything an attack against Republicans.

2007-11-08 12:58:13 · answer #5 · answered by UNITool 6 · 2 0

Because Liberalism is a crazy disorder. Last time I said something like this, my answer got deleted. I am wondering if YA is run by liberals or Bush haters. I even said something about Hillary, it got deleted too. You think?

2007-11-08 16:18:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Iraq had little to do with the 9/11 attacks. If you recall it was Osama. Bush was trying to to do his father proud, and protect his oil interest, by attacking Iraq. That is all it was, is, and will ever be. He put us in this fight for no reason, and he is not smart enough to get us out. T

2007-11-08 14:00:18 · answer #7 · answered by jaret b 2 · 0 1

You know, exactly the same can be said of Republicans. I've yet to see a Republican commercial that doesn't contain some kind of attack on Clinton or Obama.

2007-11-08 12:59:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because Neo-Cons have become so "crazed"- they blame all the World's problems on Liberals!!! Talk about not wanting to accept "responsibility" for anything!!! That's why nobody likes Bush anymore, -he's irresponsible! :)

2007-11-08 13:10:32 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 2

Bush and Cheney are war criminals. Unfortunately I voted for them, twice. History will show them for what they are, and what they have done. Thanks to them, we don't have a friend in the world anymore, maybe they can buy us some new allies with thier whirlwind profits from oil. Just to be fair, I have a hard time believing anyone who's a millionare (Clinton,Obama,and every other sitting and hopeful elected official) has our (the people) best intrest in mind. America needs to WAKE UP !!!

2007-11-08 13:09:47 · answer #10 · answered by J-MaN 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers