I think he's trying to break out the Harry Potter mold and avoid becoming typecast as that character. I think he made a rather strange choice but I admire him for attempting something that's completely different than what he has been doing so far in his career.
2007-11-08 12:46:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by RoVale 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
He's an actor.
Harry Potter is a character in a book.
He is acting the part of the character.
He is not the character.
And besides, the character is just that
Not a god, not a wizard, not real, not subject to the rules of the real world, not in the real world, not three dimensional, not flesh, not a living person, not a person, not able to eat popcorn, not able to read, not able to see, not able to talk, not wise, not good, not bad,not breathing, not able to think, not mortal, not immortal, not skinny, not fat, not bald, not male, not female, not anything!
NOT REAL!!!!
2007-11-08 12:53:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jon Buquor 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Harry's eyes are needed contained in the books. multiple human beings contained in the e book recognize his eco-friendly eyes which he were given from Lily. yet contained in the flicks, they don't imagine eyes are extremely that important. they offer extra value to the hair. have you ever talked about that some characters change their coiffure in the coolest purchase. for instance Dumbledore. 1st and second movie hes were given an somewhat lengthy instantly hair and beard. at the same time as Michael Gambon took the section in third, 4th, and fifth movie, his hair grew to change into shorter and wavy, besides as his beard. after we talked about the sixth movie, they replaced again his hair to instantly. What about Harry, what number cases did he change his hair contained in the flicks? What i'm attempting to say is they don't extremely take care of the small information. They began him with blue eyes so that they are going to end the tale with him having those blue eyes. Plus, Daniel Radcliffe said before that human beings ought to no longer be perfectionist. Books are completely diverse from videos. videos are basically the large difference of books. you doesn't assume them to placed each and everything it really is contained in the books
2016-10-23 21:39:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck no, I wish I could see that play. He looks good in the publicity pics I've seen. He's all growed up- accept it.
2007-11-08 12:50:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Snugs 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
gee dont you wish you could play nude in a movie?
now shut up
2007-11-08 13:56:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
jealous
2007-11-08 12:51:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by bob P 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2007-11-08 13:03:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by k_cutie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2007-11-08 12:45:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bigger than yours.
2007-11-08 12:44:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋