Is that a way of helping not become war criminals, or not help those who are, help us get out life of of crime and crooked activities in general? Why not dream up the opposite kinds of stories? Are they not capable? And if they say that the public wants it, are they just followers? By the way the first word of the first show I mentioned above is, en- I-pee. I think the software thought it was one of the words that is not allowed.
2007-11-08 11:07:21 · 4 answers · asked by SAMWINIRISE E 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Theater & Acting
Why do they have to be trying to do anything for the world? Can't they just be trying to tell a compelling story?
Real life isn't like the modern public school, with its endless series of feel-good world-centered propaganda skits and poster contests.
I'll tell you a secret. When I'm in the process of creating something, what's "good for the world" is the very last thing on my mind. I'm sure the world will be crushed to learn this, but it's the truth. ;D
2007-11-09 22:57:35 · answer #1 · answered by helene 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are trying to entertain their audiences so they can make a buck.. If the audiences don;'t like what they offer, they will go away. the problem lies within the audience, not the writers. If the audience had standards they would be met by the writers. But secular progressives (Democrats) teach there is no God, no right and wrong ideas, they homogonize the goodness out of man by replacing the individual with society. That is called socialism and it always fails.
2007-11-08 11:19:22 · answer #2 · answered by Theatre Doc 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well I wouldn't want to right stories about fluffy little bunnies.
2007-11-08 11:34:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Then turn the channel...
Whatever.
2007-11-09 05:15:59 · answer #4 · answered by Silvio 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋