Close call but id say USC only cause they keep recuiting such high class talent and everyone wants to go there and be the next Carson Palmer or Reggie Bush.Dont get me wrong UCLA is a good school and team but last year was a fluke and i dont think they can pull off another unset for awhile
2007-11-08 10:01:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lee 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
USC is a few distance extra appropriate. top now and the previous couple of years. im optimistic ucla will make an enhance faster or later, yet usc will likely continuously be a robust team. they recruit in a extensive city or perhaps usher in adult adult males from different states who're very very stable potentialities.
2017-01-06 08:20:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
UCLA is a joke, the let Norte Dame get it's only win by getting it's butt whooped. Dorrell should have been fired and left at the airport.
USC will be back
2007-11-08 12:04:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Follow the money 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How come anyone for USC thinks this discussion is only about football? I'll take the first school to 100 national championships.
2007-11-08 10:16:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by kevron531 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
UCLA its the only one ive heard of.
2007-11-08 09:53:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
ucla
2007-11-08 09:53:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Gamecocks?
2007-11-08 10:04:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wadeaux 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ohio State
2007-11-08 09:53:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by DoC MeGee 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
UCLA
2007-11-08 10:25:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nicole 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Both football teams are full of girly girls!
2007-11-08 09:54:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Neil 7
·
2⤊
1⤋