Why does everyone have to rag on OJ?

Question

One of the best ever. He was found to be innocent in court, and now everyone is out to ruin his life. Let an innocent man be!

Answer 1

I love OJ's hack and slash running style.

Answer 2

1- O.J. was found "not guilty", NOT "innocent", in a criminal trial.(there is a BIG difference between the two terms)
2- O.J. was found "responsible" in the "civil" trial.

Point 1- For O.J. to be "innocent", someone else would have to be found "guity & responsible" for the murders.
Also, as we've seen, for ANY celebrity to be found guilty of ANYTHING in southern California, the trial would have to be moved to a location NOT filled with "idiots who are so stupid that they can't get out of Jury Duty!"

Was O.J. a great RB? Yes, he was. Should that absolve him of responsibility for his actions? NO!!!
I'm very disappointed in how O.J. has conducted his "life", after football(NOT that he needs MY approval, certainly not). He was a personal "hero" of sorts, in that I admired the way people would "look-up" to him.
It's just sad how some people "let us down" when we "put them up so high".

Answer 3

I rather have 3 Mosin Nagants. on the plus area, they are regularly low-priced, rugged & solid, and ammo is low-priced. Downsides? maximum Mosin Nagant's (Finnish rifles excepted) are literally no experience for the build high quality of very virtually all surplus Mauser varieties, SMLE'S, or the additionally Mauser-style U.S. M1903. The Mosin Nagant action isn't as comfortable, the set off pull is typically very undesirable, the factors of interest are rudimentary. it rather is why human beings rag on them. The Mosin Nagant is a great rifle. it is not any longer an incredible rifle. that's an incredible fee for $one hundred. i admire the Mosin Nagant, i do no longer like it.

Answer 4

I'll admit I used to not care one way or the other, but GYPSY, I took a look at the info on that link and most of it is all hearsay from people just saying things,

But,..................... In regards to the DNA evidence found at his home that night, how does Oj account for that. Im now convinced he did it! Thank you.

But,...................as far as that Las Vegas S H I T goes it has set up written all over it. They found some people mad about the murders and set him up to fall for this. Ingenious, I love America!

Answer 5

He was found innocent by a racist jury that was more concerned whether a cop had ever said the 'N' word, than whether O.J. was a killer. There has never been a person more guilty than O.J. That's why he was convicted so easily later by a sane panel.

Answer 6

Found not guilty in criminal, but found liable in the civil case.
They found his DNA at the crime scene, he might as well have dropped his Heisman at the scene! He had a good defense and a stupid jury. What's going on right now is what people call karma.

Answer 7

He is not innocent! He is an idoit & he think he lives above the law! He needs to be locked up for good!

Answer 8

O.J. innocent? Check out this link.
http://pages.infinit.net/reparvit/nicole12.html

Answer 9

sin is sin, and we all have skeletons in the closet, but OJ has never put an ounce of energy into finding the "real" killer of his so-called beloved wife. That to me says everything.

Answer 10

Dude, hate to burst ur bubble, but that court case was a joke. He's obviously guilty. If he ain't guilty, than the earth ain't round.

Answer 11

this is the 1st ive heard of oj on YA so u made your own problem and im on here alot