this is for a geography quiz and i need the answer very quickly like before Friday.
2007-11-08 09:04:37 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Czar Nicholas II was the ruler before the Bolsheviks took over, but technically, Nicholas II wasn't a totalitarian ruler. Neither was Lenin actually, although it is arguable.
2007-11-08 09:12:43 · answer #1 · answered by Sonny K 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was no dictator. There was a heriditary ruler called the Tsar. Also: Let this be a part of your education: Vladimir Ilyanovich Ulianov called himself N. Lenin during his revoloutionary activities. People often think that N. stands for Nikolai. It doesn't.
2007-11-08 09:19:32 · answer #2 · answered by steve_geo1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nicholas II, of the Romanov dynasty. He was a Czar, which is closer to a king than a dictator. (The primary difference is that kings inherit their title from their fathers, whereas dictators take over and rule through military force.)
2007-11-08 09:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Czar nicholas alexander II deposed in 1917 by the bolshevik revolution
2007-11-08 09:10:18 · answer #4 · answered by anonymous 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
are you taking about Tsar Nicholas II ???
2007-11-08 09:11:30 · answer #5 · answered by cherry 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋