Are the Evolutionists the same people who gave us Global Warming?

Question

Are the Global Warming Fanatics and the Evolutionists one and the same?
If so then that explains allot.

http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history.html?q=blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history

Mars is experiencing Global Warming as well so do the Fanatics believe we're the causing that too?
Are there any motor vehicles on Mars?

Brandon, Al Gore is a business man and a Politician.
Why would anyone in their right mind listen to ANYTHING that comes out of that mans mouth?
Years ago people used to understand that almost all Politicians are liars and scam artists and care very little about anyone other than themselves.
Why is it that now people think that Politicians know better than we do and can be trusted?

Answer 1

No!
Evolution is a well developed theory.
Human caused Global Warming is a religion.

Answer 2

No they are not the same. Evolution was a theory being batted around since the the 1790's in serious way. There were many theories put forward to explain the mechanisms of evolution. In the 1850's (very roughly) Darwin and Wallace, working independently of opposite sides of the earth came up with the same hypothesis. Countless observations and experiments since then continue to lend support to the hypothesis, now elevated to a theory.

Global warming is another observable phenomenon widely observed since the 1970's. As in evolution there is no doubt that it is occurring although the mechanisms driving it are debated.

IN both cases the tentative explanations of the observable facts caused the opponents of the proposed explanations to resist the idea, first shrilly, then hysterically.

I would have thought that any moron capable of, if not reading a newspaper, at least watching television, would have realized that. I guess not though, which helps to explain the hysteria.

Answer 3

before everything, there is no such subject as an 'evolutionist'. Secondly, no longer everybody cares approximately worldwide warming, i do no longer, why could I? Humanity is largely doomed besides, and any injury we've achieved to our surroundings is irreparable besides. that is fairly boastful to think of that we can influence a metamorphosis only via 'polluting much less'. A supervolcano ought to pass off at any time and plunge the worldwide into yet another ice age, and there may be no longer something we ought to do approximately it. Overpopulation and starvation would be greater pressing subject concerns going into the destiny, lots greater pressing than worldwide warming.

Answer 4

No, but the methane build-up from all the crap that creationists force down educated people's throats is probably a key factor. Easy solution, if we just don't allow people with propagandist views into our scientific universities (m.i.t. etc.), schools would have to teach kids correctly in order to ensure matriculation. The uneducated can go to Billy Ray's Bible Thumpin' Academy instead, and get a degree in deep fried tastiness. Not long now until some Bible nut declares the world flat like Saudi Arabia did a couple years ago. The reason is simple, ignorant people stay at the bottom of society and dig the ditches while the educated rule the world. Keep on prayin', keep on diggin', you'll get your reward when you're dead.

Answer 5

Some might be but evolution is a conlcusion based on paleontology, global warming is from so-called ecologists.

Both are sciences and have logical processes leading to them. They also have their own detractors.

As far as huuee is concerned neither of these groups is as full of it as the creationists, they take their conclusion and enter it in to the logic then shape the facts to fit. I should not worry about them though becausse one day they'll fall of the edge of this flat earth they inhabit.

Answer 6

I think I would call myself an ardent proponent of evolution and a global warming sceptic, and I know many others of the same mindset, so unfortunately (I guess) your hypothesis doesn't seem to be well founded.

Answer 7

No, i once met a group of global warming fanatics that were also jesus freaks. That makes even more sense in my opinion - who would be more interested in protecting the planet, people who think we got here by chance or people who swear it was given to us by god?

Answer 8

Yes, they are known as scientists.

Anthropogenic global warming has been endorsed by virtually every climate scientist in the world (the IPCC report written by over 2600 climatologists and scientists in related disciplines).

And evolution is believed by 99.86% of all doctoral level biologists in the US (National Academy of Sciences poll).

Answer 9

I don't think so.
Creationist organisations don't tend to take a position on Global warming, though I think many creationists themselves are skeptical.

There are some interesting parallels. In the case of both creationists and global-warming skeptics, they are attacked by people in the majority camp. They suffer ad-hominem attacks by people who are reluctant to engage with any evidence that dosen't support their position, and they do not have access to the media channels to express their minority view.

Both evolution and global-warming take people's attention away from the Creator, who made this world and who is in complete control of the universe.
Evolutionists and global-warmers think that man can control his own destiny and is not accountable to God.

more fool them :)

Answer 10

Yes. They are also called intelligent, or "people who are not morons like those who refuse to accept the obvious".

edit: Adelaide B is clearly a person who believes in the conservative fundamentalist fantasy rather than the world of reality in which we live. How sad that people, in this day and age, can be so deeply, profoundly ignorant.