Bush should be tried for war crimes and executed. Beheading sounds fitting. Of course, he should be water boarded during interrogation first.
2007-11-08 07:55:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by lcmcpa 7
·
8⤊
4⤋
i definitely do in contrast to Saudi Arabia, yet I dont think of i could refuse the loose holiday, i could pass there for a sparkling adventure to appreciate extra appropriate how the everybody is. i do no longer think of there's a rustic interior the middle east i could refuse to pass into. thank you John (:
2017-01-06 08:04:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is a party game question and miserably worded
you sound like you would support torturing as well,
since it might keep people from doing something.
I would never occupy any country unless with my
vacancy money, so the question is moot, reported too.
If I had indeed the desire, though as a leader, I would not
mind beheaded fellow people at all. better them than me.
2007-11-08 08:03:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Will 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
-0- stateside because we are fighting terrorists over there. And, if the "occupation" is illegal as you suggest, why haven't the libs in Congress taken action to stop the illegality?
2007-11-08 07:55:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
When you are fighting an oppressive overlord with more power than you could imagine you have to resort to measures of pure evil in order to win. Anything goes when your enemy is corrupt and much stronger than you.
2007-11-08 07:54:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Do you even have a clue as to what is going on in th real world or do you get your news from behind bars at the zoo?
2007-11-08 08:21:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Neal 4
·
0⤊
6⤋
Why are you upset that we liberated 50 Million muslims in the Middle East?
It's kept us safer!
2007-11-08 07:55:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4
·
3⤊
7⤋
Maybe you should ask Nick Bergs family. Nick was simply working there and was beheaded on video. Youre right, those poor misunderstood terrorists. Lemme guess, terrorism doesnt exist, right? (shaking head in disbelief...)
2007-11-08 07:52:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
8⤋
I think the relatives of 3000 victims on 9-11 would disagree with your statistics.
2007-11-08 07:51:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
8⤋
Yeah, but what do you do if you want to avoid having your World Trade Centers blown up, your embassies taken over, your barracks blown up, your innocent wheelchair bound citizens shot and thrown overboard, etc., etc., etc, ad nauseum, skippy?
2007-11-08 07:53:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Trollbuster 6
·
4⤊
7⤋