2007-11-08 07:19:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Other - Music
hey george g..the chili peppers havent even been around 40 years you ******* retard!
2007-11-08 07:30:59 · update #1
The Beatles were 4 talented musicians who could all write and sing (even Ringo...lol).
The RHCPs learned their instruments as they made records. The singer can't sing a note but his voice is perfect for the songs he's singing. The Beatles greatest 'musical' strength were their 'songs'. The RHCPs greatest strength...period...is their 'songs'. It's all about the songs and both bands paid great attention to their songs.
2007-11-08 07:34:49 · answer #1 · answered by Army Of Machines (Wi-Semper-Fi)! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles, I hate the Red Hot Chili Peppers.
2007-11-08 15:27:05 · answer #2 · answered by 2XXX 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Def. The Red Hot Chili Peppers.
2007-11-08 15:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by st4fckr 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Give me a break - The Beatles blow the Red Hot Chili Peppers away !!! Their music is still played over 40 years after the band started.
Let's see the RHCP do that ! No way !!!
2007-11-08 15:27:01 · answer #4 · answered by george g 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Red Hot Chili Peppers..............No contest!
George g Red hot chili peppers have been together for 25 years next year, now that is not bad going. Although the Beatles music has been played for longer (obviously) they where not together for 25 years where they? No so sshhhhh!
2007-11-08 15:23:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
thats two different era's ur talking about, the beatles in the 60s and the red hot chilli peppers during the 80s.
theres a huge difference between the two including different music genres
not much to compare if u ask me
2007-11-08 17:09:56 · answer #6 · answered by one of a kind 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Rocket Queen on this one... you can't seriously compare them. Unless of coarse you totally hate one or the other, which I don't. They are from two different times in music history, and they have drastically different styles.
2007-11-08 17:53:58 · answer #7 · answered by ☆Michael★Anthony☆ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You might as well ask "What's bigger- a flea or an elephant?" In the pantheon of rock'n'roll, there's the Beatles, then there's everyone else.
2007-11-08 15:26:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like both of them!
well the beatls are legends!
the red hots are future legends!
anyways who cares who is better??they both rock!!!
2007-11-09 19:51:41 · answer #9 · answered by greentea 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i really wish people would stop asking "whos better?" about two bands from two completely different genres and times.
2007-11-08 15:25:31 · answer #10 · answered by rocket queen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋