English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history.html?q=blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history

2007-11-08 06:14:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

I wish a lot of the climate change extremists knew more about how iffy this subject is, about things like solar cycles and natural heating/cooling cycles of the earth.

He simply holds the beliefs that most rational people have. He did not, however, say that global warming was not happening - he said just not at the rates some people claim. And it's not that it's man made, but it's certain aided by man.

There is NO dispute about global warming, it IS happening. The real argument is about the rate at which it's happening, and the impact (if any) humans are having on contributing to it.

2007-11-08 06:19:12 · answer #1 · answered by Frank 6 · 7 2

People hear what they want to hear, and ignore everything else.

Here are the points he makes.

1) Is Global Warming Occurring? Yes!

2) Is it occurring faster than at any other time in history? No!

3) Has man had an effect on it? Yes!

4) Is man affect of any significance? No!

5) Will we be able to tell, one way or the other? Yes!

6) Is the world in peril? No!

The Global Warming Media train has plowed through all common sense, and has made those who are looking at the data with a critical eye heretical non politically correct crackpots. Despite the fact that the data supports their conclusions, that the Global warming we are experiencing is a normal part of the cyclical nature of the earth.

But those who worship under the High Priest Gore will only see Answers 1,3 and 5 and cry that we need to do more, before it is to late.

But I agree with him in 20 years we are going to look back and laugh the way we laugh at Bell bottom pants today.

2007-11-08 06:30:57 · answer #2 · answered by QBeing 5 · 3 0

Not so much. All the article says is that the founder of the weather channel thinks global warming is a scam. It gives no facts. It calls people who believe in it " well informed but very gullible". But it relies on people believing "The Founder of the Weather Channel" and his supposedly well informed opinion. Do you (or does he) really think so many people believe in global warming just because Al Gore says so? His movie gave a list of information, and a serious blow would attack that information. Calling the scientists involved a conspiracy to get research grants and impose their radical environmental agenda, not effective unless you can lay out the case.

2007-11-08 07:05:08 · answer #3 · answered by Eric 4 · 1 0

confident it has exchange right into a faith and Al Gore is the pope of the cult.think of of ways plenty money specific communities will make off of the hype.think of of all that government money going to "analyze".besides there is only plenty you're able to do ,regardless of each and every little thing whoever controls the climate controls the worldwide.worry is the final political motivator. climate exchange is a factor of the character of the planet.uncomplicated experience is to have sparkling power yet till there's a dollar in all of it that happens is communicate,communicate and extra communicate.government policies,fines and outcomes(gotta get that bailout money someplace) We incredibly choose sparkling air and water .i'm the unique recycler and that i do no longer waste power only like many individuals.i exploit power and don't decide for the "guilt" holiday of doing so. I surely have a concern with Gore the guru who flies around a gasoline guzzling jet.So does Queen Pelosi who opted for a much bigger one to fly returned and forth to California.remember her asserting she desires to maintain the planet,yeah she flies we walk.we are able to all start up by using using the recent power saving easy bulbs. Oh I forgot they are those with mercury in them.Oh,properly looks like a good option on the time. i assume you all heard that some genius baby-kisser wanted to tax cow farmers for any that own extra advantageous than one hundred for emitting "methane gasoline" yeah it incredibly is actual.will we bottle it fairly?Or on 2d concept deliver some from the bull to that baby-kisser as he's familiar with the B.S. while he sees or smells it.

2016-11-10 20:19:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He's been branded a heretic in the "new world religion" of Gaia. John Gray PhD meteorologist has been stating for decades there is no evidenciary information to substantiate a a run away climate. Mr Coleman is not the 1st of many climatologist to say the same thing. It is pure unadulterated socialist/liberal bullsh*t.

2007-11-08 06:58:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

George W. Bush called Global Warming "junk science". As nothing he has said has ever been true, then I am convinced that global warming must be a very real threat.

2007-11-08 06:29:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The biggest blow to the scam called "Global Warming",now often referred to as "Global Climate Change" is the truth. However most of the media has bought into this myth,so those who speak against it are often essentially muzzled. After all you don't get ratings by telling people the world "isn't going to end"

YTP

2007-11-08 06:20:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Its too early. The headline is meant to grab attention (drama). Not relay all the facts.

If there is really truth to this, it should show up in 2-3 days. We will see.

2007-11-08 06:36:56 · answer #8 · answered by Robert S 6 · 1 0

Scientist now believe with polar ice caps melting, it's cooling the northern oceans which will trigger the next ice age. Most of the northern countries will be affected. They calculate it's within the foreseeable future.

2007-11-08 06:26:00 · answer #9 · answered by rlstaehle 6 · 3 1

Newsbusters: Exposing and Combating Liberal media Bias
hardly a definitive site on global warming.

No - John Coleman is a meterologist, not a climatologist.
Your site is just grasping at straws to find SOMETHING to argue against the massive scientific evidence presented by REAL climatologists.

2007-11-08 06:22:38 · answer #10 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers