English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, there are many people out there who believe the so called official story about the 9/11 attacks, saying that Al Qaeda carried it out and the country was caught by surprise. However if anyone has seen any Alex Jones documentaries, the information he presents conflicts with this. Do you all think that there was something fishy about the way the attacks were carried out, and the events that surrounded the towers collapsing rather neatly and the one side of the Pentagon that had not been reinforced yet being hit. And also the lack of videos of a plane actually hitting the Pentagon?

2007-11-08 04:23:48 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

27 answers

I think there is some conspiracy behind 911, they said too quickly it was Bin Laden. Remember Rambo 3 how much US support the mujaheddin (Holy warriors)were getting to fight the Russians, now they are called something else. What would make a US ally turn against the US.

2007-11-08 04:33:24 · answer #1 · answered by Neo 3 · 1 4

No matter what- it happened and numerous lives were lost becasue of the events that took place on that day. We'll let the government handle the who, what & when's - our foucus should be on rebuild our relationships with one another because it seems like alot of people came to dislike other groups or nations because of this- believe me- there was probley one of ever nationality or race that died or was directly effected by the events- so it's some thing that disrupted our entire society.
Please the media is going to displace what is settling for the masses- weather it's true or not is up to you as a indivdule to research and come up with your own conclusion and it seems to me that you have found conflicting information so there must be a lie or gap in the information the lead up to that day- and also that availibilty of information before that day was pretty much free and open so the way things were carried out could have very well been researched and planned for many years just so it could leave a question mark over your head and many others about how & who carried out the attacks.

2007-11-08 04:35:38 · answer #2 · answered by shalirha 3 · 1 0

There are some curious things about the events of that day, and some questions left answered. There are some fishy things.
However, most of the "conspiracy" stuff can be explained away with simple logic and a little knowledge about fire, physics, buildings and such. For example, the twin towers did not fall at free-fall speed, yes very fast, but not free-fall.
Take everything Alex Jones says with a grain of salt.
The public has not been told the whole truth about that day, and never will. But the basic story is proven true. We do know Al Qaeda members attacked US soil.

2007-11-08 04:59:26 · answer #3 · answered by E. F. Hutton 7 · 2 1

yes, but here 's another big coincidence: Dov Zuckheim the Pentagon controller who 'misplaced' $2.6 trillion Dov Zakheim was also President Bush's senior foreign policy advisor during the 2000 campaign.

"He was (is?) Corporate VP1 at System Planning Corporation, a major player in the "Homeland Security" industry.

One of the products that SysPlan sells is the Command Transmitter System, a remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles2 . It's highly customable and configurable to interface with an almost limitless number of vehicle types.

The remote control theory of 9/11 looks a little better every day "

BTW why does AJ try to divert attention away from Zionism, defend it and throw blame onto other groups like Mexicans and Chinese?

is he to be trusted? or a fear monger with an ultrior motive?

2007-11-08 05:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by John M 4 · 2 2

The hotel company I work for has a hotel half mile from The Pentagon. I was working there on 9/11/01. They were in the middle of a renovation and there were engineers working on the roof. These are guys I have known for years, and whom I trust implicitly. They actually SAW the plane hit the Pentagon. It was a plane. Not a bomb. Not a missile. An airplane.

2007-11-08 04:27:27 · answer #5 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 10 1

These stupid video's online that say they make it up... well if they managed to hijack planes and crash them into key buildings who's to say at an earlier date they didn't get someone to sneek in and plant explosives like has been shown on the video's.

And whats not to say that those small explosions wheren't the outer frame bursting out of the wall with all the weight pummeling down on it from the inside. There was no actual fire from the small "explosions" it was just dirt and debris.

also.... it was hardly a planned event to crash a bunch of planes so not gonna have the best footage of something that hasn't been hit yet. If it was planned then would have a camera crew standing outside waiting to capture it all to get the best media coverage...

comon, think about it

2007-11-08 04:33:35 · answer #6 · answered by romeo_loves_his_juliet_4_eva 2 · 1 2

First, I don't confuse information with facts. 2 + 2 = 5 is information. it is however not a fact. I have watched many "documentaries" about the various 9/11 conspiracy theories and it amazes me how much mis-quotes and false science is used to back them up.

The video of the Pentagon was taken with the worst possible camera for capturing high speed near range objects. It is a security camera designed to monitor a parking lot day and night. As such it has a slow aperture speed (1/60 and 1/125 are pretty standard) and a low frame rate (looks like about 2 to 4 frames per second), A plane traveling at 500 MPH is covering 738 feet per second. As such it will cover almost 6 feet inside of 1/125 sec and a little over 12 feet at 1/60. How clear would the picture be under those circumstances if the plane was exactly in frame when the shot was taken? Not very. Take a picture of a person running across the shot of a camera at 1/60 and you will see what I mean. Even at running speed the picture is blurry. An object going 50 - 100 times faster is going to be unrecognizable. The blur in the picture is large enough to be an airplane.

Read http://911myths.com for additional details.

2007-11-08 04:26:52 · answer #7 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 7 5

There are videos of what ever hit the Pentagon. At the gas station across the street, the Hotel facing the pentagon and the Highway department cameras. They were all seized within 5 minutes of the incident by the FBI and never released. If it was a plane, just release the video showing it and shut everyone up. But still..6 years and no video. The key to it is bldg 7-look at bldg 7. No plane hit that and it fell at 5:33 pm..with minimal damage..

2007-11-08 04:29:00 · answer #8 · answered by Krypto_3726 2 · 5 4

No it's not fishy.

THE PENTAGON
There are literally hundreds of people who saw the low-flying plane come in. Many saw it hit. Many of these people gave their accounts to the newspapers where you can read about it today (archives)

Dozens of workers came to the scene and found body parts & plane parts.

The lack of a good video is irrelevent given all of the above.

2007-11-08 09:09:59 · answer #9 · answered by J 5 · 1 2

It seems to be easier to believe the government story because it doesn't hurt as much. With the drive through society we live in many people are unwilling to do the hand work to examine a much more logical story. Especially a story that may make you feel very disturbed.

Everyone, it is time to take the blinders off, you can handle the truth, right? Take a look!!

2007-11-08 04:31:23 · answer #10 · answered by Waas up 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers