What does him endorsing Obama have to do with his racial comment? Supporting a black candidate does not erase what he said. If anything it makes him look like he is overcompensating. If he truly believes that black people are the N-word, then why on earth would he vote for a black person to run the country? It looks suspicious. Whether he meant the N-word in reference to all black people or just his son's girlfriend, he still shouldn't have said it and now he needs to be a man and just deal with the aftermath of it. However, I truly could care less who he votes for, his endorsement of a candidate is irrelevant.
2007-11-08 04:30:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by ALeoStar 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i could end from what you have provided here, Barack Obama has a diverse type of philosophy while it is composed of ways he sees united statesa.. He would not have self assurance in traditionalism. He in ordinary terms believes in seeing his suitable of united statesa.. the place each and all the anybody is on a equivalent ordinary. as a effect helping his wealth distribution theory, Barack needs each and all the' international to be on the comparable enjoying field. He needs all international places to be the comparable while it is composed of skill, funds, no longer one having an side over the different. as a effect he's somewhat naive. and blatantly liberal. He might fairly communicate an armed crack broker to dying than shot the bastard. Hoping that someway the crack head might have a lucid fraction of 2nd and supply the weapon up and sing alongside got here Jones or somethig in simple terms as stupid. he's punctiliously unrealistic, as a effect helping the elitest theory. Obama is obvious and modern-day threat to this u . s . a ., must be voted out of place of work in 2012 or if we are fortunate adequate to question him in 2011 faster. Barack is a real believer in the hot international ORDER.
2016-10-01 21:41:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't care -- only those "actors" who have shown that they know a little about politics deserve any kind of listen. Reagan, yes -- I'm still not sure about Ahhnold -- don't think he could have won any state BUT California. Susan Sarandon, Brad Pitt, etc. (geez, why are all the moron actors on one side of the aisle -- I wouldn't mind calling out a moron Republican actor every so often, really), put their faces in politics too much as it is -- one more doesn't help anyone.
2007-11-08 04:25:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by herfinator 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all, who recorded his private conversation and why?
Secondly, he has just as much right to express his views just as others do. They make such a big deal over the "N" word while I can't count the times I have been called a honkie Mother F'er, cracker, etc., yet there is absolutely no outrage about that. When a disparaging remark is made toward certain people, it is a hate crime. Yet, while those same people call others names it is considered free speech. Wake up, people!!!
2007-11-08 03:58:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bill 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
This is not the first time in the world that a racial slur was made. What do you care who dog votes for? Did you know that Bush and ObAma are 9th cousins.
2007-11-08 03:54:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tony G 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
you did say(if),and i doubt he will,if some one was attacking your family,i don't think i would give a dam what i said,the big old N word.whats this?its OK for them to call each other that,but let a white man say it,all; heck breaks loose,who is this group that has the right to tell some one what to say or not,its not there fault they were used as a slave,nor ours,we can not be held accountable for what my forefathers did,no more then they take the blame for not knowing the only word their forefathers could say and it was Niger,a river that they were taken form
2007-11-08 04:32:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by THE"IS" 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Who cares who Dog endorses for President. I don't think many really care who Dog chooses.
I don't think he "should" endorse Barack as pennance for the racial slur, I think that would give him less credence...Dog just needs to lie low.
2007-11-08 05:32:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by RetroDiva65 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I just watched a 7 minute clip of Dog on Larry King last night - and I believe him - His son's girlfriend and a few other girls tried to jump Beth outside - and tried to film it - she didn't fight with them though - Dog was just pissed, and like he said, he was trying to find words to hurt Tucker out of his anger - I believe everything he said. I'm surprised at myself because I thought there could be no explanation - but it makes sense. Here's the clip if you're interested:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2006/11/30/lkl.daily.duane.dog.chapman.aetv?iref=videosearch
2007-11-08 03:54:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Since I consider Dog pretty unintelligent, I sure wouldnt want him endorsing a candidate for president. It would do more harm than good.
2007-11-08 03:54:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Diane M 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
probably not. people would think he's only endorsing Barak to make it seem like he is not a racist
2007-11-08 03:55:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by cute_girl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋