If Democrats lose again in '08, who will be first to be thrown under the bus?

Question

Howard Dean?
Harry Reid?
Certainly not Hillary.
Obama?

Answer 1

Dean or Pelosi. I mean how can you lose to a Republican Party that's struggling so bad? For Pelosi to take over as Speaker and then post approval ratings BELOW Bush's is simply bad leadership, according to the voice of the electorate.

Same with Dean. Dems should sweep everything for the next two election cycles, but his firebrand borderline-socialist views alienate a lot of his own mederate party members.

Dem voters have to think, do these two innefectual, hyper-liberals really represent the Dem Party core values? I don't think so.

Answer 2

Howard Dean

Answer 3

Hopefully the blame will be placed squarely where it has always rested but been ignored- those registered Democrats who cross the ballot and vote for the Republican. It happened by the hundreds of thousands in the last two elections and yet, nobody got a bus . . . or a rope.

No, instead, the Democrats, unable to fathom that their own loyalists would scorn them, found a scapegoat in Ralph Nader. With Ralph considering another run and indeed, being drafted by an organized effort, maybe the Dems will finally have their chance to look reality straight in the eye and come to terms.

Answer 4

Other than Obama, all of the above , including Hilary will not only be thrown under the bus, they'll be thrown to the wolves.

OBama represents the voice of change in the Dems, that pivotal time when it changes generation wise. To get the "old" ones , even though they'll be kicking and screaming , out of the road and let new leaders in.

However the old maxim still fits absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely for both parties.

Answer 5

Dean

Answer 6

NONE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED, no liberal will ever suffer !!!
Should the Dem's loose in 2008, any CONSERVATIVE SOUNDING Demo. WILL Be not only thrown under the bus, but backed over and re-ran over !!!
Just look at what the Dem's / lefty's did to a 'moderate' sounding, INTELLIGENT person just a few years ago !!!
Do you remember the name JOE LIEBERMAN????
Study about him. If you are not old enough to remember, ask some one who was around and interested in the political situation in the 1999 to 2000 time frame !!!!
IF THE DEM'S LOOSE '08, IT WILL ALWAYS BE A CONSERVATIVES FAULT , AS LIBERALS NEVER - NEVER EVER MAKE A MISTAKE !!!

Answer 7

We can't lose on 08 unless the DNC is silly enough to allow Clinton to run. Then we will all be the big losers for the next 4 years.

Answer 8

VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR ALL YOUR DREAMS TO COME TRUE !!!

Who's going to pay for it stupid. YOU ARE !!!

It's amazing,you still haven't figured it out yet.

What a bunch simpletons !

Throw all 435 and 100 under the bus and be done with it. (for you who don't know what the numbers represent, I'll make it easy for you).

435 - House(representatives)
100 - Senate

Start with a clean slate with Federalists and constitutionalist. Maybe then we'll have a decent REPUBLIC*********

Answer 9

that's no longer his doom or Karma. it somewhat is POLITICS. it somewhat is the way this works. people will continuously bash on Obama and a few will continuously love him. have faith me, no longer each and every little difficulty that occurs in government is as massive as radicals make it look. with the aid of ways, the article says that they disagree with the timing of Obama, no longer that they have got lost their have faith on him and are going to pass against him or that they are begging to "distance" themselves from him. Like I suggested, making a large deal out of a small difficulty. the genuine reason maximum politicians do no longer choose for to the touch the priority of immigrating in any away (for or against it) is as a results of the fact elections are coming up and this would injury the probabilities of a number of democrat and republican incumbents alike.

Answer 10

The Democrats will throw the American public under the bus. Or they will say that there was a mistake in the vote counting. They would never admit that they had an under qualified candidate.