nope, attention whores want to be the centre of attention at all time. high maintenance women want to be pampered and taken cared of...but you can be both!
2007-11-07 22:47:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Two different animals there. The attention whore is all look at me, look at me, talk to me, talk to me. While the High maintenance woman is also look at me, talk to me.. you are responsible for the condom purchase and making the bed
2007-11-07 22:51:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Feminists are at heart, socialists. Any concept of "inequality" bothers them. Socialists attempt to handle inequality with the aid of taking from people who and have earned it and giving it to those that have not; feminists do it with the aid of imagining a fantasy wherein men and girls individuals are comparable aside from some 'plumbing' down there and up there. it somewhat is why feminists and socialists help each and each others schedule and vote for the comparable political party. They see injustice the place there is not any and attempt to apply the skill of government to basically right it.
2016-10-15 11:12:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess the two can be one in the same,but then they are their own entities as well...in my opinion of course..=)
High Maint. women tend to need more of the material "things" than the attention....The other needs more emotional support to get ego boosters...
Combining the two could be a really bizaar life to lead...
2007-11-07 22:53:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say "attention whore" is closer to "flirt".
2007-11-07 22:47:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by mcd1901 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
umm why did you just call me a whore? how do I know you?
2007-11-07 23:10:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like it :)
2007-11-07 22:46:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by sammy jo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes you could say so.
2007-11-07 22:47:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or man.
2007-11-07 23:15:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by I am the Badger Princess. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup.
2007-11-07 22:46:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋