Well, i don't know what to say.
I though a cow falling on a car was nuts lmao, but this.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20071106/tuk-britain-laws-offbeat-a7ad41d_1.html
What do you Y/A people think?
2007-11-07
21:35:11
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Humza
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
thought* sorry
2007-11-07
21:35:27 ·
update #1
curious steve: i'm looking, no what????
2007-11-07
21:48:56 ·
update #2
curious steve: now* (sorry)
2007-11-07
21:49:17 ·
update #3
Mark: Thanks, this will keep me entertained all day lol
2007-11-07
21:50:40 ·
update #4
KatKat: i hate mince pies, but i didn't even know that law existed. So mince pies here i come! lol
2007-11-07
21:51:47 ·
update #5
northvil: I dread to think
2007-11-07
21:52:16 ·
update #6
cukkoo: thats what i was thinking after reading northvil's reply lol
2007-11-07
21:53:14 ·
update #7
Mrs Ricky Bobby: i don't even know what to say about that one.
2007-11-07
21:54:24 ·
update #8
Maid Angela: I know what you mean, another example, men were not allowed to wolf whistle at women passing by. (think that was aimed at builders)
2007-11-07
21:56:35 ·
update #9
Maz T: Monkeys are forbidden to smoke cigarettes in South Bend, Indiana.
In Iowa, State law forbids any establishment from charging admission to see a one-armed piano player
NUTS NUTS NUTS lol!
2007-11-07
21:59:06 ·
update #10
There is an, outdated, law in Wiltshire that states that you can shoot any Welsh people coming into Swindon on a Sunday.
As yet, and I have been there with the gun loaded on many a Sunday, no obvious Welsh people have entered Swindon.
Shame really...
2007-11-08 00:50:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by manforallseasons 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
English law is full of such pieces of legislation. Parliament has been passing acts for about 600 years and over that time conditions have changed so what was required 100 years ago is now not relevant. When I was studying law we did look at one of the education acts (I forget which one) that had never been used and was never likely to be. One of the problems is that Parliament are so busy passing legislation that unless a particular act is causing problems there is little time or money to spare to repeal them. I do remember that at one time it was the law and maybe it still is that a London taxi driver had to carry a bale of hay and a bucket to get water for his horse.
There is also the point that lawyers love old laws. The older a law is the more authority it has and barristers who are trying to establish a legal point will go back hundreds of years to find a something to hang their argument on.
2007-11-07 21:40:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Maid Angela 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The reason these laws still exist is that Britain has had a 1000 year long legal history. They were brought in for genuine reasons hundreds of years ago (for instance no suits of armour in parliament was brought in to stop MPs intimidating and/or killing each other, no mince pies was brought about by the puritans to stop people celebrating Christmas (they thought celebration was immorral) Parliament has just never got round to repealing them now they're irrelevent.
2007-11-07 21:53:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good point, although I think the US is king when it comes to bizarre laws:
In Logan County, it is illegal for a man to kiss a woman while she is asleep.
Monkeys are forbidden to smoke cigarettes in South Bend, Indiana.
In Iowa, State law forbids any establishment from charging admission to see a one-armed piano player.
In Montana, it is a felony for a wife to open her husband's mail.
If a child burps during a church service in Omaha, his or her parents may be arrested
In Ashville (North Carolina), it is illegal to sneeze on city streets.
In Cleveland, women are forbidden from wearing patent leather shoes, lest men see reflections of their underwear.
[I assume that means the women's underwear - could be a contentitious point in court]
ad infinitum....
2007-11-07 21:44:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Maz T 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i might certainly talk on your fiance in earnest to verify if he basically thinks it somewhat is weird and wonderful or if he believes his family contributors to be extremely dysfunctional. there's a brilliant distinction between weird and wonderful and dysfunctional, and if he's in settlement that his family contributors acts out in procedures which at the instant are not suitable to the norm I see no reason to not persist with by using with your plans to marry. My element is this; all of us come from someplace and basically because of the fact there substitute into or is a ethical hiccup in someones family contributors it does not recommend it somewhat is appropriate. Your fiance may be wanting to interrupt the cycle and bring up his standards and you're able to be responsive to that for confident. As for the destiny mom in regulation, don't be too severe of what she wears or does in her very own residence, it somewhat is her selection and he or she has outfitted her shelter to in nice condition her, yet speaking to a stay-in person toddler approximately unusual sexual antics or acts (peeping tom), is rather risky and could be a image right into a possible larger concern for the toddler, thinking consistent with threat it rather is ordinary to look down or up a woman's clothing! I recommend whats the subsequent step? foodstuff for concept!
2016-09-28 14:07:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've always found it amusing that I am a repeat offender on every Christmas day!! Mince pies are my desert of choice - I'd live off them if I could, I wish they made them all year round!!!
2007-11-07 21:40:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
OH MY GOODNESS!!..... what they gonna do with the dead body keep it in a cell for however long the sentence is for dying, before they allow to buried in peace?
2007-11-07 21:41:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by cukkoo 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can tell you right now law or no law, I live in Scotland and nobody is getting in my house to use my toilet!!!!
2007-11-07 21:44:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I liked number 6 very much ... Imagine it! 'Scuse me officer, may I piss in your helmet?!'
2007-11-07 22:56:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by LONDONER © 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
okay its a stupid law but you can't punish the dead
2007-11-07 21:38:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by bilbobagsend 6
·
1⤊
0⤋