English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Honestly, i thank he is protecting big insurance companies, and medical institutes that have continually raped middle class Americans.

2007-11-07 19:34:29 · 10 answers · asked by Ron K. 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

10 answers

I'm a U.S. citizen, and I'm firmly against universal health care. In fact, I'm firmly against anything that will increase the role of government in my life. My life is my responsibility, not the government's. Remember, that government which governs best, governs least.

2007-11-07 20:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I am against government involvement in health care. Free health care should only be provided to those that cannot help themselves through systems like the existing Medicaid program.

Most of the people who " cannot afford" health care can. They simply have their priorities wrong. They ride around in new cars paid for with money that should be buying insurance.

Some changes in law should be made relative to employers providing insurance and the regulation of groups which define rates.

Healthcare for all but you pay your own way.

2007-11-07 20:01:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In order to provide universal health care we would have to raise taxes to pay for it. That money doesn't appear from nowhere. American mostly support the philosophy of living by your own wits. This means of course that some people fail do to their lack of wits. I can see both sides of the argument. Personally I think there are other more important problems in America, but not many.

2007-11-07 20:40:59 · answer #3 · answered by William T 6 · 1 0

The idea of Universal health care seems great, but it's not realistic in relation to American political culture (individualism, liberty, etc). I think the idea of health care is appealing to Americans, but are we all willing to pay the tax money associated with providing universal health care? Probably not. And seriously, why are you solely blaming Bush? The real culprits are the interest groups and the legislation who succumb to their wants.

2007-11-07 19:44:23 · answer #4 · answered by cris 2 · 2 0

I am proudly one. someone must stop this madness of thinking the government can take care of all of us without a bill or consequence of this action. the government cannot even take care of and manage themselves let alone anyone else. any type of spending by anyone creates a bill. when the government spends we all pay that bill. when the bill is irresponsible and/or foolhardy, as in the insurance situation we all have to pay for the mistake.

continual confiscatory taxation as we have now and this race toward socialism take away from the incentive for individual production and the inherent right to reap the beneifits of what you ve worked for. this idea that i need to take care of my fellow man is certainly admirable, but when my fellow man makes more than i do and is perfectly able to take care of himself as is with the hillary 80k a year family mess, the idea becomes sick. perverted and ludicrous, a clinton signature move.

2007-11-07 20:51:45 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 0

I am against universal health care. I dont need the government involved in my life and health any more than they already are.

2007-11-07 23:44:26 · answer #6 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 1 0

I am a US citizen and I am against universal health care. No, I am not rich and no, I am not a business owner. I just don't agree with the philosophy.

2007-11-07 19:37:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

He and the criminal group he represents it is against any benefit or welfare for and by the people of The United States, guarantee 100%

2007-11-07 19:39:39 · answer #8 · answered by sea link2 4 · 0 1

I'm 100% against working people being forced to provide free healthcare to people who won't work.

2007-11-07 19:41:22 · answer #9 · answered by "That One" 5 · 2 0

I am against it. Medicine costs money. If you can't afford it, you shouldn't get it. That's what it means to be poor; you don't get everything you want. If you want to live in a social welfare state move to Sweden.

2007-11-08 02:55:47 · answer #10 · answered by blakenyp 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers