Is anyone else waiting for a communist revolution to take place?

Answer 1

Must it be communist? I mean, in early times they
wanted wheat to bake bread, nowadays they would
want oil to drive their SUVs. Is there a trial version?
Then maybe, 3 years evaluation with save disabled.

Answer 2

The lame minded, lazy and completely ignorant voted 'exchange', blindly. The extra clever voted that way because of the fact they hate others having liberty and freedom and function sufficient ability to guard themselves from the ravages of socialism. and then the final of the purveyors of serfdom at terrific, slavery for many, voted for it because of the fact they are going to be the rulers. people who did no longer vote are the actual losers, for by using their lack of information and indifference have chosen the top stone for freedom's grave. The patriot will die a complicated loss of life for they'll proceed to combat even after the reality has been set in stone. the assumption of a loose election each and every 4 years will quickly be a factor of the previous, no count number if it isn't any longer already, because of the fact with a 2 party equipment we can't inevitably chosen the chief of our decision. And the final merchandise on the time table is the unlawful Federal Reserve equipment which controls the government and the media and actual tells the familiar public who to vote for.

Answer 3

well, maybe in Mexico, especially if we ever secure the border.

A lack of a middle class is required for a revolution of the masses, The GOP is still a good 15 years away from totally wiping us out to give tax breaks to the rich and to feed money into their corporate partners.

As they don't win every election it will take longer than that. And it won't be called a communist revolution, even if it is.

Answer 4

Nah, because the trouble with communists is that they tend to have this idea that you need a vanguard of the party to organise the revolution and tell the proletariat (and indeed everybody else) what to do, which has historically almost always ended up with some form of Stalinist dictatorship.

I personally would prefer to see institutions based on coercion, violence and intimidation dismantled, and replaced with ones based on mutual cooperation and free association, 'cause I'm one of those old-fashioned left-wing anarchists. So I'm not a fan of communist revolutions, not because I think that people cannot be trusted to run their own lives but because communists will not let people do so - which is what makes them resemble all the right-wing American fascists who will lock up anyone black or brown and force the rest to read the Bible and/or kill poor people.

Answer 5

The price of your computer alone would feed a family in Ethiopia for months. I'm sure a huge percentage of the third world would love to confiscate what you have so that they could live better. By your own estimation, this would be the fair thing to do. Instead of asking this question endlessly, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, sell your computer and whatever other luxuries you own, and send the money to those who consider you wealthy?

Answer 6

No. Most of us have realized Communism has FAILED every time it's been tried.

Why do people like you keep believing it'll work the next time?

What's the definition of insanity? Trying the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

Democracy and Capitalism result in freedom and prosperity. Communism doesn't. It's just that simple.

Answer 7

No one I know of wants a communist revolution. Maybe you should move to Cuba or China or another wonderful communist country

Answer 8

Not necessarily communist, but definitely a revolution.

Answer 9

America successfully brought capitalism into respectability and lawfulness from it's robber baron start via laws and oversight.

Communism is nothing but a overboard reaction to the ills of unrestrained capitalism. We have no need for it.

Answer 10

If you want to live under communist rule, then by all means MOVE TO A COMMUNIST COUNTRY.