I am fascinated with right wing trying to take down the only candidate with a chance to beat the evil empire (Hilliary and Co.). Somewhere along the line they forgot about the 2006 backlash from the voters in response to poor right wing leadership. Ron Paul might be the best guy to be president but REALITY is he won't be president.
So are you going to stand by your convictions and tear down the only moderate who can beat "the beast from the east" and risk having a Democratic President (and first Man) or are you willing to compromise to ensure security, low taxes, and control of the White House? Hilliary will beat any true conservative right now are you willing to compromise?
2007-11-07 13:02:31 · 8 answers · asked by Ponch 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I like Mike Huckabee! But, I could live with Giuliani! I can't live with Hillary, who is a socialist in disguise! She'll mercilessly tax the middle class to pay for all her medical and educational programs. The rich will, as always, have their usual tax breaks and loopholes. She'll let her celebrity friends sleep in the Lincoln Room, etc.! So, the brunt of costs will fall on the middle class. She'll end up throwing a few crumbs to the poor, and will demand their complete adulation. I couldn't take eight more years of that crap and corruption!
2007-11-07 13:36:31 · answer #1 · answered by Pinyon 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Neither. There both liberals. If Rudy is nominated Social conservatives are forming a 3rd party so rudy would get no more than 30% of the electorate in the general. IMO Rino Rudy is much more dangerous to the conservative movement than Hillary. Id rather have Hillary destroy the country for 4 years, so conservatives can get back to being real conservatives
Romeny, Huckabee or probably Fred are the only true conservatives.
2007-11-07 21:59:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As much as I do not like a Hillary for president, I feel Rudy is worst and most scariest person running on the Republican ticket. He will never beat Hillary, Ron Paul will. Rudy is bad for the Republican party, bad for the future of this nation. He has a unsavory background and no political maturity to even match Hillary in a debate. Ron Paul served him up for dinner (remember the book list) after his "I have never heard of that" comment. It shown just how dumb he was (Rudy). How much 9/11 can a person interject in their campaign? He should be a shame of his 9/11 self imposed hero status. Ask any New York firemen about how they feel about Rudy-they hate him. He has no substance other than how big and bad he is and will be fighting the terrorist. He is not taking the high road and talking about real issues, neither is Hillary. The top tier of the Democrats running are all New World Order hounds and will fight more for foreign interest than upholding the constitution, and yes including Obama. Lets face it, Ron Paul is the only answer, he is the only candidate who has a sound voting record and speaks the only candidate who tells it like it is and who actually mentions the constitution. Oh, remember that document? Vote guiliani or hilliary we are doomed. They will send this country on a downwards spiral spin. We will be in war with Iran then Syria ( in a proxy war for Israel) and you sons and daughters will be drafted into the army.
2007-11-07 21:32:14 · answer #3 · answered by Introspective Girl 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sorry I'm sticking with Ron Paul, I'd rather vote for a candidate with character
and Rudy is unelectable.. there are so many factors against him.. the main one being he advocates Bush's blotched foreign policy... Not to mention his not so "hero like" track record from 9/11 (see source listed below) And accusations of racial profiling.. his co chair stating that "Blacks are retarded" most of his backers have already been embroiled in drug and prostitution scandals.. He can't even manage to carry his own state against Hillary, let alone the whole country.. ANY republican presidential candidate has a better shot at beating Hillary then Giuliani.. People have the perception that because of his views on gay marriage and abortion, he will appeal to democrats and independents.. First of all he has already stated in the last debate he would pass an amendment BANNING GAY MARRIAGES if they became to "popular" Second of all in order to overturn roe vs. wade, he'd have to go through the supreme court and guess who he plans to appoint, anti-abortion judges? Hillary is a polarizing figure, but most people consider Giuliani a down right criminal.. sorry but he'll never be elected president..
2007-11-07 21:15:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Reality? Reality is he raised 4 million in one day, won 18 straw polls, and won every single debate poll. The only people who say he has no chance are people that don't like him. Ron Paul will win the general election and people will say he has no chance.
2007-11-07 21:14:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberal Giuliani, Hillary would be the moderate. At least we can keep our guns under Hillary, Rudy will take them all away.
2007-11-07 21:07:33 · answer #6 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary, I'm voting for Huckabee though. He's a true conservative.
http://myamericantoday.blogspot.com/
2007-11-07 21:06:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would bet on Rudy. He talks sense and gives straight answers.
2007-11-07 21:07:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋