What would happen if the world were to unite and detonate an ice-bomb (a bomb that freezes water) at the pole? Would that in any way help solve global warming? I would predict that the carbon in the atmosphere already would counteract the ice bomb, but is there any realistic way to reduce/reverse the effects of global pollution?
2007-11-07
12:42:01
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Lobo man
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Earth Sciences & Geology
Now and then: Well, considering our gov't has been messing with dark matter and nuclear power, it wouldn't seem all that far fetched. I love the fact that you only served to mock my question and avoid answering it in anyway.
2007-11-07
13:03:52 ·
update #1
bh8153: My question was hypothetical. Hence the reason for "what would happen..." in the beginning of the sentence, and implies a condition (the existence of an ice-bomb). My suggestion isn't unmerited. Can you explain to me as to why its scientifically impossible? You can freeze water, right? We have those instruments, no? Perhaps an ice bomb may sound sci-fi, but I'm sure there are other methods of freezing large areas at a time. It's not a stupid question. It may seem like nonsense to you, but my question pales in comparison to something like: "How mani tyms a dai du u poop?!". And trust me, I've seen lots of those.
Now and Then: Whimsical? Perhaps you set an example and proof-read your answer before I can take you seriously. Your spelling is just as ludicrous, very ‘innefficient’. Not to mention that DRY ICE blasting is one the most efficient ways of cleaning machinery and manufacturing equipment, is very environmentally safe (no CO2 or add CO2), and is often a byproduct. Wiki it.
2007-11-08
11:16:49 ·
update #2