Effect of Currency Devaluation on GDP?

Question

Please refrain from posting if you DO NOT know the full answer.
Since a country's GDP is the total market value of its output (consumption/0investment/government spending/net balance of trade) measured in US dollars. Lets use the Canadian dollar as the example; the Canadian dollar has gained 40% on the US dollar over 4 years, a whole 10% in the past three weeks (from 1 USD-1 CAD to 1.1 USD-1 CAD today). If the Canadian GDP were to be converted to dollar, wouldn't this "raise" their GDP by 10% artificially. Obviously, GDP does not work this way, how is currency exchange rate adjusted? How is it dealt with?

@Kevin; Is is understandable that GPD of a country is reported in their native currency. But for comparison purposes, when one say 'Country' has the 3rd world largest economy, GDP nominal is referred to. Will I be be seeing a magical 20% increase of Canada's nominal GDP next year and a 7% increase of Chinese GDP (I know the currency is pegged, but rates were forced down this year) on top of their natural growth?

@Meg; I already know and understand that PPP is adjusted just exchange rate and standard of living.

Answer 1

When looking at the buying power of a country in world markets the exchange rate is used, and Canadian dollar can buy 10% more of US produced goods
When comparing countries standard of living GDP is converted into PPP or purchasing power parity, which is and index like the CPI, that looks at price of a market basket of goods in the country using their currency. Using this method the purchasing power of the Canadian dollar will increase somewhat because imported good will be cheaper, but not the full amount of the exchange rate shift. This number is quoted in US dollars and is the equivalent purchasing power of $ in the US.

Answer 2

Looking at the link I included might help you get the idea. You are right, we can't inaccurately count a "higher" GDP as growth if it's just a result of the floating exchange rate against the US Dollar.

BUT, it's not correct to say that GDP is "measured in dollars". GDP is measured by each country in its own native currency. It's just various organizations or economists or news media like "The Economist" who then translate things into US dollars for the sake of consistency in reporting. Statistics Canada issues its regular reports on Canada GDP using Canadian dollars, not US dollars.

But as you have anticipated, there are pitfalls you have to be careful to avoid when dealing with various currencies. So, econ data like in the link below for Canada would show a snapshot of GDP or GDP per head, etc, based on the exchange rate when the report or table is set up. (And hopefully will tell you that exchange rate in a footnote).

But something like a rate over time, such as an annual GDP growth number, will be taken from the original country's reporting in its native currency. So, exchange rates have no impact (and inflation is properly accounted for in a "real GDP" number). And if someone were making a graph or table of Canada's economy over the years in U.S. dollars, they'd just have to be careful to pick one exchange rate and stick with it, even if (say) that exchange rate didn't actually apply back in 2002.

Answer 3

Deflation (damaging inflation, falling expenses) is often concept to be a foul subject economically, yet surely that is fairly beneficial. For earners, it ability that they do no longer want a salary develop each and every 365 days just to maintain up with the fee of residing. they are in a position to even think approximately salary cuts with equanimity with the aid of fact the determining to purchase capability of their income is increasing. For savers, it ability low value expenses have become greater useful as time is going via, quite than much less useful while the determining to purchase capability is eroded via inflation. This encourages human beings to save, it somewhat is mostly a sturdy subject. the money they save isn't locked up and mendacity unused; banks lend it out to others. because banks lend out quite a few circumstances their deposits, there's a multiplier consequence. Falling expenses advise human beings eat much less, with the aid of fact they have an inclination to attend till now they purchase, understanding the fee will at last drop. in case you have any green credentials in any respect, you will recognize that falling intake is a robust subject because it reduces carbon footprints, packaging waste, landfill, emissions, toxins and so on and so on. For the sturdy of our environment all of us ought to eat much less. In some fields, working example something to do with digital technologies, falling expenses are the norm. desktops, iPods and digital cameras get greater low value each and every 365 days. yet those industries are between quite a few the main powerful and inventive ones around. Deflation isn't a foul subject, yet governments do no longer like it lots, in all probability with the aid of fact the money they get from taxes decreases. Japan has had a deflationary financial gadget for some years in spite of the indisputable fact that it nonetheless seems to be a remarkably powerful usa. possibly we could consistently emulate its fulfillment!