2007-11-07 09:50:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Two different scenarios as Al Qaeda paid Saddam for the training camps there, where as Bush is killing them daily (and a very good job at it by our troops if I do say so myself)! thanks for asking!
2007-11-07 09:55:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Saddam's intelligence services may have been quite brutal (not to mention indiscriminate), but they were quite effective when it came to Al Qaeda. Yep, ol' Saddam really lived up to the US government's expectations (Which is why they helped install him, and bought weapons from South Africa for him to use against the Iranians and others).
2007-11-07 23:52:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and Bush said on Iraqi television that we would lure terrorists to Iraq and use their country as a battle field .. do you think that is fair to the Iraqis? why do you think now the Iraqis hate us? and we have created thousands more terrorists other than alquaida .. and Alquada has become mainstream by us treating the Iraqis so bad. martial law for years makes the people terrorists bush no co giving all the rebuilding jobs to white boys ,, make s the Iraqis hate us they have nothing better to do than fight the American occupiers.. no work no electricity.. why not fight the Americans who steal there oil.. and give the oil money to Iraqi oil administration to give out as welfare,, is bush a commie? would that system work here in America? no its made to fail in Iraq,, they want the war they make money off the bombs and the oil..
2007-11-07 18:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ironically, Saddam, who was courting terrorist organizations with checks to the families of suicide bombers and the like, couldn't get the time of day from Al Qaeda (which found him far too secular, a failed, pan-Arabist fascist dinosaur).
2007-11-07 18:02:39 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Funny. Neither....a failed media.
"But at the same time Friedman was cheering on the invasion, he was inserting one alarmist caveat after the next about how dangerous a course this might be and about all the problems that might be unleashed by it. He thus repeatedly emphasized the need to wage the War what he called "the right way." "
2007-11-07 18:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be foolish! Iraq is th world's biggest terrorist bug zappper. Bush WANTS them to go there like moths to a flame rather than come here.
2007-11-07 17:55:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Saddam was, if any one was harboring an Al Qaida in their village the entire village would have been killed. This is effective but not how an American would do it.
2007-11-07 17:59:20 · answer #7 · answered by rance42 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You actually believe that Al Qaeda didn't maintain a presence in Hussein's Iraq, and that he wasn't supportive of their terrorist activities? <....sigh..>
2007-11-07 17:56:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
a huge yawwnnnnnn!
2007-11-07 18:06:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋