English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've heard everything from "we'll be reading the Koran by christmas" to "she'll convert America to communism".

The con record of correctly predicting outcomes is quite pathetic.

- The economy did not tank after the 1993 Clinton/Dem bill. It grew every single month Clinton was president.
- The iraqis didn't welcome as liberators.
- The war did not pay for itself.
- The Mission was not Accomplished.
- Iraq did not have a new WMD program
- The insurgency was not in it's death troes.
- The insurgency did not die down after the elections.
- The insurgency did not die down after Saddam was captured.
and
- The insurgency did not die down after Saddam was executed.

2007-11-07 09:36:38 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

J1,

No. Bush Sr was basking on what Reagan did. The Bush Sr RECESSION cost him the election.

2007-11-07 09:41:30 · update #1

19 answers

Well,we won't have to worry since a Dem won't win.

2007-11-07 09:40:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 6

The economy did not tank after the 1993 Clinton/Dem bill. It grew every single month Clinton was president.

Yup, legislation that opened the World Wide Web to commerce was a coup.

- The iraqis didn't welcome as liberators.
Yes they did at first.

- The war did not pay for itself.
It will when we get that oil.

- The Mission was not Accomplished.
It won't be if the Democrats have their way.

- Iraq did not have a new WMD program
Nope and both parties read the intel. Poor Saddam got hung for faulty intel, not for being the Butcher of Baghdad.

- The insurgency was not in it's death troes.
Let's just say there are less al qaeda in Iraq now than before.

- The insurgency did not die down after the elections.
No, the passion for world dominance of Islam is strong.

- The insurgency did not die down after Saddam was captured.

Nope, the vaccum was opened for all the bad boys to move into town.

- The insurgency did not die down after Saddam was executed.

The power struggle is on in Iraq and Iran wants total control so they can cut off our oil supplies.

2007-11-07 17:47:07 · answer #2 · answered by dovesong44 2 · 2 3

The economy did not grow every single month Clinton was president. Are you living in a cave?

The Clinton recession in 2000 had negative GDP going into 2001.

Bush took office at the end of January 2001. As anyone with a brain know the President works with Congress to develop budgets for four years into the future. President Bush 1 wrote the basic budgets going into 1996 and Clinton wrote the budgets going into 2004.

The third quarter of 2000 and the first quarter of 2001 had negative GDP growth.

Your propaganda might work on clueless people who do not have the capability to read. The rest of us know how full of garbage you are.

2007-11-07 18:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Here you go for you obviously not informed....uh....people.

No one said the economy would tank, however I point out that the econmy and the stock market (a key to it) has Doubled since Clinton, under Bush

The Iraqi did welcome us as liberators, as my son was there and can confirm it with man thousands of pictures,

No one ever said that the war would pay for itself, you must be listengint to the left wiing pap again

the Mission was accomplished as we won the war aginst the Iraqi troops and the republican Guard

Iraq did have WMD's, both Chemicalk and biological, proven fact phot's of some of them still intact that were taken back iun 2003, where were you (oh I see you mean Nuke types)

The insurgency is in their death throws, as death of American soldiers and civilians are diminished month by month and now at the lowest it has ever been since the insurgency started

The inusrgency was not in existence until the defeat of the Iraqi troops and the Repuiblican Guard and hence the captuar of Saddam, an opening arose and they tried to fill it.

And the insurgency is dieing down month by month, they are losing dude so get over it, I know you want them to win, buyt it will never happen.

Killed, cut and wrapped....next!

2007-11-07 17:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

You have to understand that pointing out flaws in the Democrats views and plans draws attention away from flaws and mistakes this current administration has made. If Democrats can successfully make the 2008 Presidential election about people's opinion of President Bush's administration, they could run anyone and win. If Republicans can successfully show that Senators Clinton or Obama are no better than the current administration, they at least stand a chance in the next election.

Welcome to the game called politics. If you can't beat them face to face, play dirty.

2007-11-07 17:43:13 · answer #5 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 6 0

Not to hurt your feelings too much, but almost all the gains under Clinton were from the dotcom bubble which popped terribly shortly before he left office.

2007-11-07 18:20:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

BOTH parties have trouble predicting outcomes.
BOTH parties have gotten us into this mess. (both Dem and Repubs vote to authorize war)

America needs to start pulling together and quit the finger pointing.

2007-11-07 18:11:33 · answer #7 · answered by Caesar Jeff 4 · 2 1

That's silly! Everyone knows Nobama and Hillary aren't communists, they are socialists. It will take longer than one term for the Dimocrats to hand this country over to the radical Islamists, so we can elect a GOPer in 2012, if we are foolish enough to vote in an illegal alien loving, radical Islamist appeasing Dimocrat.

The Dims will give amnesty to all the illegal aliens in the USA if they are elected; you don't have to be a psychic to predict that.

2007-11-07 17:50:11 · answer #8 · answered by Shane 7 · 3 3

Great question!

If Hillary is elected the cons lives will go on. Many will be placed in insane asylums. Others will go into deep depression. The survivors will still give "Hillary sucks" replies on Yahoo!

2007-11-07 17:46:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

As a liberal, I will not be reading the Koran, and women in my family will never wear burkas. Little bin Laden and his towelhead, dress wearing followers cannot possibly conquer this country. Only con traitors believe such a thing.

FEAR is COWARDICE!

2007-11-07 17:49:12 · answer #10 · answered by CaesarLives 5 · 3 4

I don't hear conservatives saying that "we'll be reading the Koran by christmas" to "she'll convert America to communism". I hear right-wing idiots say that . But I also hear left-wing idiots say worse.

http://myamericantoday.blogspot.com/

2007-11-07 17:40:43 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

fedest.com, questions and answers