English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

I believe it is more of manufacturing costs issues. The current quads are just made of 2 dual core dies that are in abundant production.

2007-11-07 10:09:33 · answer #1 · answered by Karz 7 · 0 0

I imagine it is easier to just double things up and they'll probably follow along like memory (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc.)

There's not much use for a quad-core system at the moment, as no software supports it yet and only a handful support dual-core. It's all for show right now.

2007-11-07 09:00:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

AMD will make a 3 core soon. It will be the quad code with one core disabled. These are likely to be chips that have a manufacturing defect in one of the cores, but leaves the other 3 working.

As for skipping 3 cores, its just easier to double them as far as physical layout.

2007-11-07 09:02:55 · answer #3 · answered by Neebler 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers