wow, i don't have kids but that is like asking if ppl would rather have their kids sexually assaulted or have them dropped on the head... you are crazy and if i had kids, i would rather just stay home!!!l!!!
2007-11-07 08:51:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by word doggie 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'd sooner push the children through a woodchipper than allow the children near either. Both are threats to children, even though MJ allegedly never touched the boys.
2007-11-07 08:49:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by MakayoKou 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
britney spears
but that would be a serious push... at the moment my babies are in intensive care being watched over at the mo by my wonderful mum! so i really dont think i would want either of them, i hardly even trust my mum with them!
2007-11-07 08:48:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by spongebobs biggest fan 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson! At least he'd know where your children were! Britney would forget where she put them.
2007-11-07 08:52:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pinyon 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They would be better off being alone if I had those choices but I would pick Britney because at least I know they wouldn't get felt up, only bad nutrition.
2007-11-07 08:47:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nikki 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
My kids would say britney,bearing in mind they are all over 19 lol
2007-11-07 08:49:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by little devil 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson.
2007-11-07 08:47:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♕ℭrown ƒit me good♕ 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
britnet spears although having two daughters i suppose they would be about as safe as each other, jackson likes boys
2007-11-07 08:49:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by button moon 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It'd be kinder to just give the children back to the Lord!
2007-11-07 08:52:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither, I would rather not go out and look after them myself, after all they are my children
2007-11-07 08:47:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Baps . 7
·
3⤊
0⤋