It has come to my attention that the NEO-CON boogeymen have been trolling this forum.
Also with the recent removals of many top posters has me wondering if the Neo-Con Boogeymen are actually Social Progressives?
I am independent so don't blame me.
2007-11-07 06:31:41 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bring back suthrnlyts and Brian!!! Freedommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!
2007-11-07 06:36:31 · answer #1 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The Neo-Con Boogeymen? LMAO!!!
You are funny...
Social Progressives are trolling here too but I think they are mostly harmless.
2007-11-07 06:36:21 · answer #2 · answered by Neal 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
no actually a lot of the people who were removed were conservatives. To someone on the far left, those people who were removed would have been considered neo-cons.
2007-11-07 06:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
After the better part of a decade spent studying political science, economics, finance, and public affairs, I have come to the following conclusions:
"Politics is the process of who gets what."
-Anonymous
"Democrats and 'publicans, they ain't fit to eat."
-Jasper Fiddlecorn
And that's pretty much it. Oh, also, if anyone presents an argument, premise, or cause to you, and their argument is based entirely on moral arguments/ideology (right v wrong, illegal v legal, rich v poor, greed v generosity, left v right) depend upon it that their position is one of self-interest and selfishness, entirely, and you won't have to dig very deeply to find it.
2007-11-07 08:48:27 · answer #4 · answered by Andrew S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Con as I have had several harmless answers that were easily with in the guide lines deleted.
And I also note several missing cons.
Possibly just decided it wasn't worth the effort.
2007-11-07 06:47:34 · answer #5 · answered by CFB 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After Yesterday's Senate Hearing it looks like China controls Yahoo
2007-11-07 06:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Trolls as usual are doing this... but I blame Y/A for not reinstating them....they denied Suthrns appeal...
2007-11-07 06:51:01 · answer #7 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It seemed like a lot of consevatives were removed I know of two my self that were top contributers Brain and southernlyst.
2007-11-07 06:36:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Funny how recently a spate of conservative high profile posters were removed for merely expressing their conservative views, a bit tyrannical in the liberal ranks arent we?
2007-11-07 06:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by aCeRBic 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I would think that it is just someone in the extreme that has difficulty in accepting the truth, or an answer that dispels his or her argument.
2007-11-07 06:35:30 · answer #10 · answered by rance42 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋