in my paper, i need at least 3 strong reasons for supporting the tinker v. des moines case. the only thing is, i cant think of what other elements were involvled. my first main reason is: Attempting to change or hide another’s opinion because you do not agree is unethical and unjust.
ugh i have to find two more big reasons. help pleeeeeeease.
thanks =]
2007-11-07 06:18:59 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
They were protesting in a non-demonstrative way (not bringing attention to the armbands) and passive, and they did not impinge upon the rights of others
There was also insufficient evident to support a contention that the armbands were, in fact, disruptive to the learning process, interfering with other's rights or interfered with school discipline
2007-11-07 06:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read about the case here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._des_moines
2007-11-07 06:22:06 · answer #2 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋