is it because she flip flopped on her last debate? With the illegal driving licence question?
2007-11-07 06:18:15 · 13 answers · asked by t c p 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Perhaps her perceived weakness in the debate is a factor. It also seems that both Obama and Edwards are really starting to step up their campaigns. It is really becoming more of a race now (which I think makes it much more interesting than a Hillary landslide).
Another interesting question is "will the current loss of voters in the polls do anything to derail her chance at the presidency?"
2007-11-07 06:26:38 · answer #1 · answered by JWrightus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the flip-flop in the last debate and the way she is currently handling it is part of the reason. I personally know several people who have changed their minds about her for exactly that reason. That and the fact that people are starting to wake up now that the elections are beginning to move closer. You have to admit that things began quite a bit earlier this time than they have before and many just weren't ready to start looking at candidates yet.
2007-11-07 12:35:13 · answer #2 · answered by Lev8mysoul 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Voters are beginning to realize how scary it would be to have her running the country.
Seriously, I think once you even give the appearance that you are flip-flopping on an issue, it makes you look bad. Voters don't like candidates who change their mind on something.
2007-11-07 06:56:19 · answer #3 · answered by davemac 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's lost a few poll points. Three in one poll, and six in another. All within the margin of error, so it's not that big of a deal. But this small shift did occur because of the debate. It sure hasn't been enough to threaten her status as front runner though. It will take a whole lot more than one flubbed question in a debate to take down Hillary.
2007-11-07 06:36:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
People have a hard time understanding what she plans to do should she be elected. And from listening to her over the week, it's sounds like she may have the same issue.
It's not horribly Presidental to not ever want to take a stand.
2007-11-07 09:02:38 · answer #5 · answered by G-gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you going to say when she is elected? Unless there is an Earth shattering event that is exactly what is going to happen.
Then hopefully she will start reversing the devastating damage that Bush has been doing to America and it's standing and reputation in the world!!!
2007-11-07 06:33:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it's more because she's started campaigning in the general election before she won the primary. She seems more like she agrees with Bush everyday, even while professing how she's battled him. We're starting to see more of her true nature, especially with her playing the gender card. She is too polarizing and people are starting to wonder if she is truely electable. I'm voting for John Edwards.
2007-11-07 06:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
She will say anything the voters want to hear just to bag a vote and the voters are catching on. She is to much " Do as I say, Not as I do! " Sound familiar?
2007-11-07 06:36:49 · answer #8 · answered by MISTY 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd say that's it plus to be a leader you have to be able to hold up under fire, Bush is an example as Well as Bill Clinton.
2007-11-07 06:25:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because she is a scumbag and its all coming out now. she hired private detectives to get the dirts on the women who were accussing her husband with the sex harrassement... god help us if she has an access to FBI/CIA etc...
2007-11-07 06:27:50 · answer #10 · answered by ss 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋