Can you explain this to me?

Question

And it's a serious question, too. I asked a question about the bush body count, I just received a violation notice, and the question was "deleted."

Now - in all honesty, how many times a day do we see that bogus "Clinton Body Count" propaganda posted here? Daily??

Why was mine deleted?? And why are the Rightwingnuts constantly whining about how "biased" Yahoo is, when clearly both sides are getting violations?
**********************************

Deleted Question: Have you seen the Bush Body Count?

Question Details:



If you feel this content was removed in error, please contact Customer Care and tell us why.

Regards,
Yahoo! Customer Care

To KUDZU: No, I'm not referring to the Iraq War. It's a partial list of people who bush the first and the current bush Have had murdered because they were "inconvenient."

Here, check it out:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/bush_body_count.htm

To Petri: Uh.....bush is our President? So frikking WHAT? That excuses him from criminal acts? bush is a murderer and so was bush the first. They are flagrant criminals. Being "granted" the Presidency just made it easier.

To Lordkel: "irreverent and irrelevant" I don't think are in the Community Guidelines. What are you, a commie?

To wizjp: Oh, really. You haven't seen one "in weeks?"

There was one posted YESTERDAY. Which is why I posted the bush body count.

To Beau: Uh....WHAT? Can you give me a link?

Answer 1

I don't know why that was reported. The only times I have ever reported anyone is if it involves animal abuses or cruelty.

It sounds like the work of a spoiled brat.

Answer 2

Yahoo itself has a filter to pick up some content and violates it. You are lucky your account was not suspended and when they do that they refuse to tell you why!!!

Yahoo is following the politics of the administration and it's actions follow President Carter saying punishment without saying what the accusation is, is illegal, immoral and against human rights.

Yahoo is doing it's bit in making the US a laughing stock every time anyone mentions justice, fair play or honesty. It would just be sad if it stopped there but it goes much further - it makes more enemies for the US, turns allies against it and turns it's actions into a tragedy for America.

Answer 3

Yahoo is biased, but it favors the conservative side. All you have to do is read their news to see it. A few months ago they ran a story about a bill passed by Congress requiring trials to be held for suspects being held at Guantanamo Bay. The headline was, "Congress Sides with Enemy Combatants". That's so biased Rush Limbaugh would be ashamed to say it. By the way, "Limbaugh" is recognized by the Y!A spelling checker, but "Olbermann" isn't. I think that speaks for itself.

Yahoo administrators no longer assume any responsibility for handling abuse reports (and frankly I don't think they ever did), but it's not surprising that radical conservatives would be drawn to Yahoo in large enough numbers to bully everyone with a differing viewpoint.

Answer 4

I agree. I've seen plenty of posts by conservative contributors that obviously violate the community guidelines, yet they're allowed to stick. For example, I really wonder why a certain poster with an obsession with a certain ex-president still has his account. Not that I want anyone to get his account suspended, but he's certainly one of the worst offenders.

Answer 5

I never open question that refer to body count on either side, but the Clinton body counts pops up regularly in answers to questions on all sorts of topics. I have never seen a Bush body count, Most of the nutty posts on him center around 9/11. I only report people who post obscene insulting answers, but i do wish that there was a category for conspiracies, so you could all talk to each other and not bother the rest of us. If I believe one tenth of what was said i would have fled the country in fear of my life long ago, and would not be posting revealing the secrets of people who might kill me.

Answer 6

Well, we can't blame suthernlyts or Brian!!


I don't have a clue. I haven't reported anyone in a long time, but I have reported extreme racists spewing hate and one HUGE LOSER who asked if liberals were happy about the home invasion in Connecticut. Other than that, I'll be honest, if someone has an opinion I really can't tolerate, I block them. I have three people blocked and I really don't care about having an honest debate with them, because I don't believe they are capable of honest debate.

Answer 7

Did you see Bush's new hockey league? It's crippled ex-soldiers. It was on Robin Meade's Morning express this AM.

Answer 8

I haven't seen the Clinton body count, why would I? God forbid should he ever even think of confronting the enemy over numerous attacks on our country! And why do you call it the Bush body count when he was only one of many who authorized this war? Did you ever consider that one of the posters might have lost a loved one in war and was offended by your callousness of using that death for political means?? Think of others before you speak!
Deltafox- good one!

Answer 9

You mean the Iraq war death toll so far? Yes, I see it every day. Calling it the "Bush Body Count" is sort of unnecessary because we all know who's responsible anyway.

Answer 10

Works for me.... it's about time that irreverent and irrelevant questions are deleted.... more so when posted by those that haven't a clue as to what is actually going on in the world and are capable (barely) of only 3rd grade potty humor and potty mouth language... facts are foreign to their world entirely...

Answer 11

There was no "Clinton body count" that I've ever heard of. Right now Bush is our president and to say its "Bush's body count" could be construed as slanderous. That's a ridiculous phrase. Why don't you talk about Saddam Hussein's body count? There was the real enemy.