the US can be happy or not ? is nuclear power real problem for the US ? be honest answer,please
2007-11-07 04:59:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thanks all of them. I could not choose the best answers that all of them are the best. sorry
2007-11-08 03:14:30 · update #1
Iran has no nuclear weapons to eliminate.
2007-11-07 05:02:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
The US appears to be moving from one oil rich nation to the next. Pssst Don,t tell them Scotland has Oil........ oops!
nay i don't think Iran has nuclear Weapons, unless the US has been selling them already.
Nuclear power is no real problem, I'm sure the US is developing much more targeted Space based weapons.
The US government should help Iran with is Nuclear Power Station, the last thing the world needs is another Meltdown. All that Oil would be worthless for the next ten thousand years
Maybe solar electric cars would happen then
2007-11-07 05:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by steven m 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iran doesn't have them (yet.) If they cease their nuclear program, then the US would be happy. The danger with nuclear weapons is that a single person can kill millions with a single bomb. It makes sense that you'd be wary over who has them and who doesn't.
Who has nuclear weapons will be a real problem for any country. It's a lot easier than one might think to get something even as big as a nuclear weapon into a country. As long as we want to protect our citizens and prevent nuclear war, we need to make sure that the only people with nuclear weapons technology are ones that aren't going to be using it.
2007-11-07 05:07:38 · answer #3 · answered by Terras 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it particularly is a large objective, and that i've got faith it must be achieved. in spite of the indisputable fact that, it is going to require lots of confusing paintings and international family members. Our worldwide status has in no way been decrease, and that i've got faith it is going to take our next President a minimum of a 365 days to repair our image and popularity. That being mentioned, in spite of if all nuclear weapons are eradicated, you will in no way have the skill to get rid of the certainty that is going with them. the flair will consistently exist to create new, greater efficient weapons.
2016-12-08 14:50:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iran wanted nukes as bad as is claimed, they could have already had a certain pakistani scientists supply them with nukes a decade ago, like he did half of the middle east.
2007-11-07 05:28:26 · answer #5 · answered by Boss H 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If they stop their nuclear weapons program it would be a large step.
They would also have to stop funding terrorists and killing US soldiers with the bombs they lend extremists in Iraq.
Other than that, they can have their sh*tty country and all the backwards laws they want.
2007-11-07 05:14:16 · answer #6 · answered by Biggg 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nukes are the problem. Burning deformed flesh, poisoned water and food, no crops.
No nukes would be a step stone to future trade and talks and living in peace.
2007-11-07 05:06:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
probably not. But let me ask,would you feel safe with a regime that declares Jihad at a drop of a hat. That has a capability like that? remember we are talking about a culture that has TV shows that discuss the proper way to beat your wife.
2007-11-07 05:16:49 · answer #8 · answered by a person of interest 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, lets trust a country who wants to wipe another country off the face of the Earth with nuclear power.
Brilliant.
2007-11-07 05:02:37 · answer #9 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Iran has proven to the world that it cannot be trusted. The US is a happy nation, however it has nothing to do with Iran. It has to do with who we are.
2007-11-07 05:04:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋