(This question was inspired by Jani Lane, I think he needs to turn in his leather pants and call it a day...)
2007-11-07 04:13:32 · 26 answers · asked by ♫ՖքØØķ¥♫ 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Rock and Pop
Les Douze ... I know your pain!
2007-11-08 08:37:38 · update #1
Poison
Motley Crue
Axl Rose........unless the original GnR lineup reunites
The Who........when 1/2 of your original lineup is dead, I think its time
Aerosmith
The Rolling Stones
The Police
2007-11-07 11:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dani G 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Eagles
The Rolling Stones
Brett Michaels
David Lee Roth
Ozzy
Saturn - You're about to get your wish, Al has said the next Ministry album will be his last. I was VERY disappointed by the last Rev Co album. Reminded me of The Smashing Pumpkins where you use the old band name but kick out the rest of the actual band that made the name what it was.
Jani Lane was such a jerk on that show Celebrity Fit Club. It's a rough fashion statement but at least get your sorry *** in shape if you plan on dressing the part.
2007-11-07 04:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by Rckets 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ozzy Osbourne Blondie Elton John Barry Manolo Michael Jackson Alice Cooper
2007-11-07 04:37:23 · answer #3 · answered by thor 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This might be a little out there for the people on this site, but:
The Temptations. When 4/5ths of your original members are dead longer than they were ever in the band and the one original member is alive and stomping a mudhole in the band's legacy, it's time to retire. If the current group were put in a lineup you probably couldn't pick the original member out anyways, but it's time to put that horse out to pasture.
2007-11-07 08:21:42 · answer #4 · answered by sdmf4u2000 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Rolling Stones
Kiss
Ozzy
2007-11-07 05:29:38 · answer #5 · answered by Peepaw 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I love them but, The Rolling Stones
No Bill Wyman, No Charlie Watts? That's not The Stones. They should call it The Mick & Keef Band, or else just retire with some dignity.
2007-11-07 04:28:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if they should retire. Maybe just get ahold of their ego's and realize they are relegated to playing not the Wembly type Stadiums where they can charge a ridiculous amount of money, but more so the Popeye's Chicken grand opening, or the pre-teen maternity parade. I think it's OK to want to rock forever, but when you get hip surgery, I think that's pretty much game, set, match
2007-11-07 04:32:51 · answer #7 · answered by fourstarchef2003 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, let me start off by saying that I did not anonymously give a thumbs down to Sookie :-)
A lot of the 80s metal bands are still making some decent music, granted not all, but a lot.
On that note, Ozzy should have called it a day many moons ago.
NP: "Sweet Jesus" - Pride & Glory
2007-11-07 05:11:05 · answer #8 · answered by Mike AKA Mike 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Rod Stewart, (stop it! now!!), Alice Bloody Cooper, Cher (no-one looks dignified the wrong side of 60 in THOSE clothes),
Michael Shenker (a shadow of his former self), The Eagles (new album...just awful),Michael Jackson (explanation not needed),and last but not least ANY band that continues to tour and promote themselves with only one original member or the pivitol member having passed away E.g, Queen, god, Paul Rogers i love you but you are not Freddie. It's s not right ..and none of you need the money.
2007-11-07 04:46:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Madonna
Bruce Springsteen
Sting
2007-11-07 04:29:45 · answer #10 · answered by AKA FrogButt 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ozzy, The Rolling Stones, Queen-Paul Rodgers is not Freddie Mercury and should not try to be! If you tour with a new lead singer you should call yourself a tribute band!Some voices cannot and should not be changed!
2007-11-07 07:32:30 · answer #11 · answered by Lisa M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋