2007-11-07 01:15:48 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
George W. Bush is the worst President in American history.
2007-11-07 01:25:49 · answer #1 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Bush's father--former President George W. Bush, Sr--hailed "The New World Order", which set the foundation for the full scale implementation of what now has become the "politically correct" laws and social pratices installed and enforced by our country's states.
The States are forced into adopting these "politically correct" policies and laws by the Federal Government--who hold the precious purse strings that award each state BILLIONS of $$$$ for their acceptance.
The New World Order's pure intent is to widen the American social gap between the "Haves" and "Have Nots"--determined by our own "democratic" government.
Sniffs a bit like Marxism, doesn't it????
George W. Bush, Jr. will likely go down in history as the worst INEPT president, next to Jimmy Carter--who also economically hurt the U.S. in his heyday. The economic damage done to the U.S. due to Bush's ineptness hits us 8 to 10 fold.
Bush needs to retire NOW from office. I don't think the U.S. can wait till 2008 for a new president--one we better pray can clean up Bush's mess.
2007-11-07 01:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
For bush; against Bush.
2007-11-07 01:27:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
For. regardless of capability subject concerns and the sub-best issues, the financial gadget has been sturdy for 4 years. Tax cuts for the many times happening joe ability all of us placed a pair greater greenbacks into the financial gadget. sturdy concept. We continued 4 assaults on American soil/assets under Clinton and in basic terms one under GW bc he went on the offensive. There are encouraging indicators in Bagdad. those of you who want a microwave length conflict are unrealistic. The Iraqi Gov't and the protection tension the two agree that civilian deaths are down 77% interior the final 365 days. Say what you prefer, yet Iraq would be greater effective with out Saddam and having an democratic best pal like that interior the area would be a huge coup for this usa. #Even Dems won't have the skill to get out of Iraq for years. Even supported bipartisan immigration reform in an attempt to cleam up that mess. i do no longer consider him on each and every thing like some social perspectives, yet he's been sturdy for this usa. historic previous will vindicate him with the aid of fact the consequence of his movements are felt in a historic context. via the way, i've got been a average self sufficient voter maximum of my existence. regrettably the Howard Dean/Pelosi game plan has rendered the Dem congress impotent and the Dem applicants inneffective panderers. the place are the typical Dems?
2016-12-08 14:40:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am against Bush I think as President he severely abused his powers that he was granted when he was elected and he has total disregard for the Constitution of the United States.....
2007-11-07 01:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
He is the President of the United States of America, the Commander and Chief, The current father to the nation.... Now, I may not agree with him on policies, but in all honesty, how could I be against him...
dislike, maybe
disagree, sure
But, against.... no way.
2007-11-07 02:02:04 · answer #6 · answered by jerome2all 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Against.....
our own government is even turning against him by vetoing his stupid spending bills and giving him deadlines to start pulling out troops from Iraq. It seems crazy when even his own political party (republicans) are voting against him and making friends with the democrats.
2007-11-08 05:49:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Hitler.....same crap different person. Yeah he's a good leader, better then Hillary Clinton with her anti-military, but he listened to a LIE which started the war in Iraq. One person told America a lie (someone said Iraq had WMD's)and Bush went over there and caused all this and now this ONE person (Bush) better get us out. Our soldiers are NOT to patrol places, which we are doing now, they are bread to KILL, but if we pull out then there goes everything that we did because it will just get worse again. Bush has dug us in a hole that we can't get out of people.
2007-11-07 01:27:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I prefer no bush but when it's time to get down I won't complain.
2007-11-07 01:22:12 · answer #9 · answered by Big Paesano 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Depends. I'm for something, against other things he does and has done. I think that's reasonable, don't you?
That certainly seems more reasonable than the attitude of many that oppose everything he's done or is doing. That, to me, is nothing but petty.
2007-11-07 01:24:40 · answer #10 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋