2007-11-07 01:11:23 · 9 answers · asked by o.j. 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It wouldn't change much. Remember Margaret Thatcher started a war between Argentina and the UK and the former PM of Pakistan (whose name is slipping my mind at the moment) is one of the most corrupt world leaders in the past 30 years.
Women have the same thirst for power that men do.
2007-11-07 01:16:01 · answer #1 · answered by Downriver Dave 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This might sound sexist, but I've always found very difficult to believe that in the 200,000+ years of human existence women have never been given a chance to rule. I've always felt that if that kind of power was what women really wanted then they would have seized it from a dumber male leader about 190,000+ years ago.
That being said, IF ALL of the world leaders were women it could go either way. It could bring some civility and peace to a the currently male dominated planet OR it would send us all into destruction due to women's catty behavior. I'm not intentionally being petty. In an office full of women without men being present the attitude is often very cutthroat and all around bitchy. Now, blow that up to a larger scale and you'd have a lot of pissed off women aiming all they have at one another. It could go either way.
2007-11-07 09:28:33 · answer #2 · answered by Frosty 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ha haha ahahaha ahhaha ahaha aha haaaaaaa!
Seriously no.
There are some serious mechanics that feminists need to understand.
If you want to believe women are just as capable and equal to men, than what would be the difference. Intolerant countries would still be intolerant countries.
If you want to believe that women are different than men, you need to pick reasons why, and any of those reasons would backfire on you.
Females have a lot to offer, but you have got to recognize there are differences in personality that are both good and bad.
There would be a better leaning toward peace with leaders taking some small offenses with a grain of salt, but accompanied with populations that take that grain of salt as a deep unforgivable insult.
2007-11-07 09:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by iooioiioo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women are no better then men and men no better then women, look at Margret Thatcher she was one of Englands worse and most unpopular PMs. I find this statement offensive and sexism works both ways.
2007-11-07 10:01:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the world would be better if all its leaders were COMPETENT. Gender has nothing to do with it.
2007-11-07 09:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. A certain gender does not a proper leader make.
2007-11-07 09:15:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
If the world was ran by women from the beginning, we would still live in caves.
2007-11-07 09:14:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Women suffer from PMS which could harm their ability to make rational decisions, so no.
2007-11-07 09:15:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no way...once a month when it is pms time at least 1 of them would shoot off a nuke
2007-11-07 09:28:14 · answer #9 · answered by charlie s 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋