No the only history they read is history that has been revised by liberal historians. I don't think liberals are just like Nazis but the Nazis were the socialist party of Germany. Most liberals believe they are the good ones. The leaders know they are useful idiots.
2007-11-06 23:10:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob J 5
·
1⤊
5⤋
Terrorists, Nazis and Conservatives: Want there religion to be the only established government religion in the world.
Liberals: you can have and practice any religion you want even Islam and Christianity, even if it offends others, as long as it does not harm another person.
Conservatives: Every legal citizen not convicted of a felony can own firearms in the USA.
Liberals: Recognize that America has the most violent crime and gun Crime rates in the develop world and removing weapons from people would save lives.
Terrorists, Nazis and Conservatives: Only freedom of speech for those who agree with their views.
Liberal: Freedom of speech for all.
Liberals: Special rights and treatment based on race and color of skin. True the PC has gone to far and this has caused discrimination, positive discrimination is still discrimination.
Conservatives: Rich get want the want and everyone else has to suffer for it.
Terrorists, Nazis and Conservatives: Indoctrination of children through the school system with propaganda video and fantasy stories about creation.
Liberals: stick to the 3 R's
2007-11-06 23:29:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by clint_slicker 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. Liberals want no government religon. Our founding fathers thought so too. I do know conservatives that want Christianity recognized by the state (eg going bezerk when a muslim congressman swears on a koran, ten commandments in the schools etc) so you kind of have this one backwards.
2. While I cannot speak for all liberals I do not know of any that want to outright ban guns. This is the classic strawman argument.
3. Liberals do not attack freedom of speech. That is done by loudmouthed conservatives who want to make criticism of an inept government treason.
4. I am personally opposed to affirmative action, as are many other liberals I know.
5. Liberals want education through the education system. We want to prepare people for a diverse world with different beliefs. It is the conservatives desire to keep our children uninformed of the realities of the world that reflect nazis.
It is utterly bizzarre to see someone claim to know what nazis, terrorists and liberals feel, but show absolutely no ability to comprehend the motives of his fellow conservatives.
2007-11-06 23:21:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Liberals have a religion? "Conservatives: No Special Treatment for anyone" (except Scooter LIbby, Mark Foley and Halliburton)
The thing I find particularly amusing is how so many other Republicans in here line right up with the ridiculous statements (and of course, they're statements made without a SHRED of a source to back up his delusions) this person spouts.
It is exactly this kind of hate and disinformation (and constant repitition, this "concerned American" trolls this same "question" everyday), the lies and the fearmongering which will pretty decisively get your Party removed from every office of publicn responsibility above the post of Meter Maid.
2007-11-06 23:57:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
What the **** are you talking about!!! it's exactly the opposite!?!? you really need to get out more. I believe exactly what the "Conservatives" believe, and I get blasted as a "liberal" all the time. Except if you claim that "blacks are recieving special treatment" then you're probably a racist nut who shouldn't be listened to anyway. Get a life.
P.S.
do you even know who the Nazis were??!?!
2007-11-06 23:14:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by You 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
The Nazis were a right-wing entity that arrested, imprisioned and executed socialists, labor leaders and communists.
---------------------------------------------
Fascism: A False Revolution
BY MICHAEL PARENTI (1996)
Fascism is a false revolution. It makes a revolutionary appeal without making an actual revolution. It propagates the widely proclaimed New Order while serving the same old moneyed interests.
Before World War I, Benito Mussolini was a socialist, but the minute the wealthy classes in Italy offered him financial support and power, he didn’t hesitate to switch sides. (We know about people who switch sides, don’t we?) And with the huge sums he got from wealthy interests, Mussolini was able to project himself onto the national scene as the leader of a movement that specialized in attacking unions, peasant farm cooperatives, socialists, communists, and anarchists. After World War I, to maintain profit levels, the large industrialists and big land owners had to slash wages and raise prices. The state, in turn, had to provide the big owners with massive subsidies and tax exemptions. To finance this corporate welfarism, the populists had to be taxed more heavily, and social welfare expenditures drastically cut. (Does all of this sound familiar?) But the government wasn’t completely free to apply harsh measures because many Italian workers and peasants had their own unions and fairly strong political organizations. With demonstrations, strikes, boycotts, factory takeovers, they won substantial concessions in wages and work conditions and the right to organize and were able to defend their standard of living. To roll back that standard of living and to get the economic changes that the plutocrats and tycoons wanted, the ruling interests had to abolish the democratic rights that helped workers and peasants defend that standard. The solution was to smash their organizations and their political liberties. The leaders of industry, along with top bankers and agribusiness associations, met with Mussolini to plan and finance the so-called “Fascist Revolution.” Within two years after seizing state power, Mussolini had shut down all opposition newspapers and crushed the socialist, liberal, Catholic, democratic, and republican parties, which together had commanded about 80% of the vote.
continued . . .
http://mostlywater.org/fascism_a_false_revolution
2007-11-06 23:24:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Earl Hickey 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Exactly the opposite, my Friend, anyone with half a brain knows that the Republican Party in the US is in reality the American Nazi Party only spelled differently. This happened in 1980 when Ronald Reagan, his "special friend," Jerry Falwell, Anita Bryant, Lawrence Welk and Roy Rodgers took over the party nationally. Check with this pas week's Newsweek magazine if you need any other answers to this subject.
There is absolutely no difference today in the US after the Republican controlled government than Nazi Germany in 1930 under Mien Fuhrer, Adolph Hitler.
2007-11-06 23:13:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mezmarelda 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
in basic terms a speedy edit for you. "Consevatives: you may have and prepare any faith you prefer even Islam and liberalism, in spite of if it offends others, as long because it would not harm yet somebody else." as long as its no longer in public, with the aid of fact as quickly as you're in public, you would be Christian or we are going to kill your canines and cats like we do in South Carolina. "Conservatives: each and every criminal citizen no longer convicted of a fellony can very own firearms contained in america." yet we conservatives do no longer ought to make you wait 7 days on a similar time as we examine your background for any psychological instabilities or felonies on the grounds that should bog down on your 2d substitute rights. That seven-day waiting era is only an evil communist liberal regulation and we might lots quite take your be conscious that your unlikely to apply that top powered rifle with the laser scope in any bell tower or e book depository. "Consevatives: Freedom of speech for all.(in spite of in the event that they disagree with Conservatives." yet in basic terms in specific "loose speech zones" set up outdoors of considerable site visitors techniques. And in case you do communicate around us or have a company that defends your magnificent to loose speech, we've the spectacular to call you anti-American and attempt to develop money in specific meant to tension your businesses out of enterprise. "Conservatives: No specific therapy for all and sundry." except you're white, Christian and male, yet are not all of us white and Christian on the interior? "Conservatives: persist with the three R's" 3 R's: Rove, 'Reilly and Rush. No propaganda there. come again on your loose speech zone in case you disagree.
2016-12-08 14:37:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So, does this mean that Don Young, who said people who criticize Bush should be executed, is actually a liberal?
2007-11-06 23:16:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wow. You have alot of time on your hands to think about this. Your government job got snuffed?
2007-11-06 23:14:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋