If there were one art that had never existed, which would have made the least difference?

0 ⤊

If there were one art that had never existed, which would have made the least difference?

This may sound like an odd question, and it is hypothetical, but if you think you have a thoughtful answer, I'd like to hear it. Of all the major arts -- literature, music, painting, sculpture, photography, film, etc., if there were one that had never developed, which would have made the least difference on culture, and why?

2007-11-06 20:50:10 · 2 answers · asked by holacarinados 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities

2 answers

poetry? what is the point?

2007-11-06 21:01:57 · answer #1 · answered by dancing queen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋

i guess PHOTOGRAPHY
our eyes enjoy the nature in real rather in photos and coming to blind they come to know abt or enjoy beauty of anything by means of literature

2007-11-07 01:57:31 · answer #2 · answered by shruthi m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋