English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which would you pick? Please state reasons. School survey.

2007-11-06 19:59:23 · 9 answers · asked by |*awesome*| 3 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

I personally think that we should have John Howard as PM again, because if we have Rudd, we will be slow in progressing work, but with Howard,we WILL PROGRESS! WE WILL SHOT UP IN THE AIR! Some of you people will think that may be wrong, but go ask the old people, 'Labour or Liberal?' Surely the will say LIBERAL.
Rich people would understand that this is VERY VERY hard work to do, having meetings, saying things and making sure that you will do it, money and many more. Put yourself in Howards shoes for a moment. Your a rich person, your were a lawyer before, you now have hard work to do now as a leader of a nation. Imainge that! I think that it owuld be hard to do that dont you rekcon?
If we have Howard we will be having an experienced PM. Rudd is young yet he wouldnt know it much.
I personally thknk that Rudd is good, he is speaking up for the not as rich people, but Howard is speaking for the rich people.

2007-11-07 22:59:21 · update #1

9 answers

I want the Liberals to win. Why? Because Kevin Rudd is too sexy. His ties are too fashionable. His glasses match his face shape a little too much and he has a good hair stylist. If he has time for those things he wont have time to run the country. My leader has to have bushy eyebrows a painful smile and a balding head. Also, Mr. Rudd Kevin is effectively marketing himself as a young Mr. Howard John. He is copying all of John's policies. He may even be his clone from the future. If I was to pick between two cloned leaders I'd pick the older one, more experience. Now if they were both chicks.. that's a different matter. Yes I am shallow.

( I'm reposting this at your request. Thanks :) )

2007-11-13 19:38:18 · answer #1 · answered by Doctor A 2 · 0 0

specific plainly that way even now , in simple terms think of this , what could have ensue if Howard replaced into nevertheless the treasurer, and the Liberal party replaced into the only party in place of work by using fact the by using fact the Whitlam era, Intest cost's does not be the point they're now, they could be very very severe, would additionally be greater than 80% , frightening adequate just to think of roughly that, in the event that they'd they had abolish the RESERVE economic employer BOARD in the event that they'd get away with it. whilst they shop harping approximately 17% mark, they're attempting to hoodwink the Australian public, for the reason that Howard has been in place of work from 1996. upload up each and all of the intrest rises for the reason that then, no longer a sturdy image i'm specific of that , 5 rises by using fact the final election 2004 , cost upward thrust are on the upward thrust whilst Howard is in denile of them and so is Costello, & Minchin as properly Australia needs a sparkling direction ,and not the previous

2016-10-15 08:14:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Kevin Rudd, We seriously need a new prime minister. John Howard has seriously stuffed up. He promised he would make 15 power plants but that has never happened and he is the reason of these interest rises and poor workplace laws as well.

2007-11-06 20:04:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Labour.
I don't like Peter Costello has a prime minister, which will happen if Howard gets elected.
Also, Kevin Rudd seems like he will deliver most of the great promises.

2007-11-06 20:05:13 · answer #4 · answered by Max A 7 · 1 0

I have a home loan, so interest rates are important to me:

In the past Labour have had interest rates through the roof, but the way things are going with Liberal at the moment, I haven't seen them drop, just go up and up and up.

I'm confused!

2007-11-06 20:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by Smirnoffette! 4 · 2 0

Rudd...i think australia needs a change, but personally i would rather not have any of the two...

2007-11-06 20:08:56 · answer #6 · answered by . 5 · 1 0

Rudd
its time for a change & a younger leader

2007-11-06 20:06:17 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Girl 7 · 1 0

i heard john howard was losing his erection, oops i mean the election

2007-11-06 20:02:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

rudd because they are better... i dunno.. they are going to be better for the families and help out with the low income workers

2007-11-06 20:04:14 · answer #9 · answered by tassiequartz 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers