English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

BO

2007-11-06 15:23:34 · answer #1 · answered by mratoza2z 2 · 1 0

"In the Presidential election, Harrison received 100,000 fewer popular votes than Cleveland, but carried the Electoral College 233 to 168. Although Harrison had made no political bargains, his supporters had given innumerable pledges upon his behalf.

Apparently there was a lot of voter fraud to get him elected. When Boss Matt Quay of Pennsylvania heard that Harrison ascribed his narrow victory to Providence, Quay exclaimed that Harrison would never know "how close a number of men were compelled to approach... the penitentiary to make him President." "

During his administration the US went from surplus to deficit.
The most perplexing domestic problem Harrison faced was the tariff issue. The high tariff rates in effect had created a surplus of money in the Treasury. Low-tariff advocates argued that the surplus was hurting business. Republican leaders in Congress successfully met the challenge. Representative William McKinley and Senator Nelson W. Aldrich framed a still higher tariff bill; some rates were intentionally prohibitive.

Harrison tried to make the tariff more acceptable by writing in reciprocity provisions. To cope with the Treasury surplus, the tariff was removed from imported raw sugar; sugar growers within the United States were given two cents a pound bounty on their production.

Long before the end of the Harrison Administration, the Treasury surplus had evaporated, and prosperity seemed about to disappear as well.

He's certainly not one of the worst, we've had some real duds.

2007-11-06 15:32:22 · answer #2 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 0 0

Fortunately, in his day, you could be pretty awful and still not cause much damage. He was not a very personable person and turned people off. It's one of things that history doesn't really stress and is important, the ability of a leader to come across to the people.

2007-11-06 15:25:44 · answer #3 · answered by cattbarf 7 · 1 0

Demographic counsel does no longer permit you realize what faith a usa could understand. by way of that logic, america is a christian usa of adult males over age 25. Does somebody have faith those are the only people who could have a say in our government? This usa grew to become into formed via employing agnostics, atheists, and deists. The treaty of tripoly the asker talks approximately grew to become into as quickly as ratified UNANIMOUSLY. This has took place 3 circumstances interior the historic previous of the U.S., and it was ratified in 1797, so a number of the adult males and females who voted for it have been the founders of the rustic. asserting it particularly is a christian usa is in basic terms mendacity in your self. No usa could make any law touching on faith. We base our criminal rules on existence, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. except an expression of those rights violates the rights of one different character, there'll could be no regulation in opposition to that expression. i'm an atheist, yet i might now no longer want an atheist president. i might like an agnostic. A individual who on no account says a word approximately faith and maximum useful cares approximately shaping our usa interior the way it grew to become into defined to be while it was created. Edit: "In god we've faith" was delivered to funds interior the previous due nineteenth century. It was further to paper funds interior the 50s. We did no longer mentioned this usa on god. The "under god" part of the pledge of allegiance grew to become into as quickly as further interior the 50s as sturdy to have the skill to extra distance ourselves from communists.

2016-12-08 14:24:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont think he is considered a bad president,he was very much for equal rights and taking care of civil war veterans...but after office he married his late wifes 37 year old niece four years after his late wifes death.he was almost 70 at this time.that might have something to do with it.i dont know really.

2007-11-06 15:35:58 · answer #5 · answered by moderation 2 · 1 0

I have gathered that he was basically kicked around like a political football, with a divided congress.

Here is some info:

http://millercenter.virginia.edu/academic/americanpresident/bharrison/essays/biography/9

2007-11-06 15:27:20 · answer #6 · answered by Boudreaux 4 · 0 0

Well I have always heard that Nixion was the worst president.

2007-11-06 15:24:10 · answer #7 · answered by Jessica Wellls 1 · 0 2

Worse than Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton? Now that's hard to believe!

2007-11-06 15:23:08 · answer #8 · answered by Rick K 6 · 2 4

ok i might be a complete idiot for asking this but we had a president named benjamin harrison??? never heard of him, maybe that's why he was the worst?!?!?!

2007-11-06 15:25:25 · answer #9 · answered by allisonbps 2 · 0 4

He ignored clear evidence of global climate change, went to war with Iraq saying they had weapons of mass destruction when they did not, ran up a big deficit which made oil imports expensive due to a weak dollar. Oh wait a minute who was this question about?

2007-11-06 15:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by .skjceuafrepiuahfpoefhpieuaf 3 · 3 5

He's got nothing on Carter. What a shmendrik.

2007-11-06 15:26:17 · answer #11 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers