Is it true that republicans would welcome terrorist attacks in the US?

Question

so that they could then claim justification for the curtailment of individual liberties. They would also claim to be justify to bomb other countries, whether or not those countries had ties to the terrorists.

Answer 1

I wouldn't put ANYTHING past this anarchist bunch. They don't care about lives here, or there--wherever "there" may be. Anyone, absolutely anyone with 1 half of a little grey cell knows absolutely what has been going on & will continue. The perfect fit for the evil twins.
Isn't it incredible, some people STILL believe Iraq attacked us! As for the cost of 9/11, heck, we've got trillions to flush down the loo. Oh, pardon me. I forgot our obscene debt to other countries. I guess that helps. It also helps that millions of Americans don't have health insurance, that American children are starving, that the public schools are a disgrace, that dams, bridges, railroads & the whole country is in disrepair because we can't "afford" to do anything about it.
What you suggest isn't at all far-fetched. They would LOVE it.
You certainly got a bunch of--illinformed? illogical?--answers. I won't even bother to comment. "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Answer 2

the respond demands solicitation from the present difficulty people in Afghanistan and Iraq. What wisely has the U. S. finished by using fact 2003 in conflict in opposition to terror? the U. S. has ultimate prompted TERRORISM in places wherein it wasnt exisiting in the previous than, changed liberals or moderates into terrorists ( individuals that have lost their families and sources in this bloodthirsty conspiracy). So in the previous than attacking Pakistan, India will would desire to think 10 events, by using fact the sub-continent can exchange right into a attempt against flooring for united states of america and u.s. with each and each taking aspects which incorporate the achievable inclusion of Israel on their factor and u.s., China, Iran, and Pakistan on the a number of factor. Plus the nuclear income can on no account be ruled out.

Answer 3

Did you know if you have numbers on the back of your door lock keys that anyone that sees the numbers can go to say home depot and look for the same numbers and will have entrance to your home. At the oil change place, anywhere. A guy I know has apolice scanner and can pick up all kinds of telephone conversations. Cell phones no problems. Go to a store that sells the equipment.
Portable phone no problem, just buy the same model and park outside.

I understand what you mean why have it if we are going to leave the borders open and 1 in 7 caught is from a terror sponsoring nation*. Airlines caved in to ACLU type tactics on being sued and dropped regualtion to profile persons gong onway with no luggage and payng cash and 9/11. Pilots went crazy over this and big unions did nothing*.
now you hve to jump thru hoops at airports, too bad they didn't stop it then. Yes I thoulght Bush admin crazy for not putting it back up also.

You need to look at the number of things that htis has stopped, it's in Outrage by Morris. Can you name two things the Patriotic Act has topped, the list is long. Would be longer except senators ran mouth on how we got some scoop on terror acts and they got wise,what creeps and they were voted into office, insane.

Talked with buddy in St Louis about Green Bay/KC game nd thought line was crooked at them getting points. If we had made a bet I would not want them getting me, but friend never pays off anyway.

So whether or not you know it anyone cn take your rights. I remember who perished in attacks and little children did not deserve that. As far as Israel is concerned 2 million Arabs live there. They wre attacked when they bacame antion and outnumbered. Talk with any West Bank Arabs here, they wil tell you PLO would pull some out at night and shot them. Israel originaly by Balfour was also Jordan, but given to Saudi head honchos cousin. So we didn't attack these people.


Yes Iraq was not a logical choice and so on, but you need to read Outrage by Dick Morris an How Satan turned AMerica against God by William Grady if you want to understand this stuff.

Onlly time will tell if Bush was right, but he doesn't care about ACLU lawsuits, he cares more about national security, something others should have been watching. Sad thing is that the democrats and some republicans voted for a watered down version

Who did we bomb. Clinton hit a Pepto factory. Reagan hit Libya and they confessed to murdering men women and children and paid $4 billion to families. Clinton bombed Serbia while OLB was in Albania. Suggest you read the last chapter of the Bible. Don't worry.

Read learn about this and you may be able to help. Check those door locks. Take care.

Answer 4

I am generally a Democrat, and I may think that Republicans are scuzzy as hell, but I don't think that anyone is looking forward eagerly to another 9-11 or similar tragedy.

Answer 5

Republicans would not welcome it. International Corporate Fascists would take full advantage of it, as they did with 9/11.

Bush was warned repeatedly that America was about to be attacked. He didn't plan it, but he did allow it to happen and then took full advantage of it to flush the Constitution down the toilet and preemptively attack a sovereign nation.

The legal framework is in place to suspend indefinitely the Constitution if the President declares a state of emergency.

All of you. Every single one of you who continue to support these International Corporate Fascists are collaborators and you will suffer the consequences of your cowardice.

Answer 6

No, of course not. The Republicans have successfully prevented another 9/11, despite the best efforts of the Democrats to get in the way. It's the Democrats who want another attack, so they can blame it on Bush, just like they blame everything else on him. Which is not to say that Bush doesn't deserve his fair share of blame on other issues.

Answer 7

i think not even one of the Americans would like to see 9/11 happened anyway.

Learn more about Republicans ideal before ask this question

Answer 8

No. If you'd lost anyone in any of the terrorist attacks in 2001 you'd realize how absurd this question is.

Answer 9

They don't need actual attacks. Over the last seven years Bush/Cheney have trained rank-and-file Republicans to wet their pants whenever they hear the word "terrorism". Now it's just a stimulus-response thing that they trot out whenever they need to scare up support for their latest attack on civil liberties.

They have raised fear mongering to an art form, and reduced most Republicans to whiney, pathetic, scared, brain dead, incontinent, zombie-cowards.

Answer 10

they wouldnt welcome it but it would be good for them politically. their voting base is paranoid about terrorism as it is and a terrorist attack would galvanize them, though i wouldnt think that any politician in our country would actually welcome any attacks, even the crime brothers (bush and cheney)