If the 'nature' side is right, it could serve as a basis for eugenics programs, official government policies to 'breed better people.' If the 'nurture' side is right, it can be used to justify abridging parental rights to give all children a 'good' environment for thier best development.
Both tend to repudiate individual responsibility, laying the blame for our failings on our parents or our society. A third idea - 'character' that people choose, to some extent, to be who they are, rather than being pre-programmed by thier genes, or brainwashed by thier environment, is notably excluded from the debate.
2007-11-06 13:54:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of that it particularly is a mixture of nature and nurture, yet i do no longer think of that's the comparable split for each individual. For some, it must be a 50/50 split, others perhaps ninety/10. yet the two nature and nurture have outcomes on the guy. individually, I surely have a character it somewhat is fairly diverse from my mom and father and not something like each and every of my siblings and that i grew to become into raised via my organic kinfolk. My husband, raised via his organic mom and a step-father with very sporadic touch together with his organic father, is likewise fairly diverse from his mom and father and siblings. yet the two one individuals, with out genes in common and no historic previous together for the period of our early existence, have particularly comparable personalities. it particularly is probably why we've been married for thus long.
2016-12-08 14:21:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There should be no debate. If "Nurture" was more important than "Nature", you could teach "calculus to a horse".
You cannot. Experiences do help shape the clay we start out as, but are they more important than the intrinsic worth of the clay?
2007-11-06 13:57:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It really isn't ... except to point out how obvious it is that BOTH are equally important. One without the other is impossible. By nature a bird can fly, a human cannot. You can nurture a bird and teach it how to fly, but with a human, you cannot.
2007-11-07 05:00:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eagiusti 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To me the only significance is being able to provide a proper environment in which to rear my child, as well as accepting inherited traits, from a behavioral standpoint.
I don't think the debate will be solved and I don't think it should be. Parenthood is challenging enough.
2007-11-06 13:51:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know,. Why does it even matter?
2007-11-06 14:13:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋