Right now, I would say the player getting Houshmandzedah is getting a little bit better deal. There isn't anything unfair about it though.
2007-11-06 12:58:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by mcq316 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the scoring system but if you get Maurice Jones-Drew's return yards and returning TD's probably somewhat fair. I would like to get Houshmanzadeh out of it so I'd give up MJD for him.
2007-11-06 20:58:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by outyler9 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it's fair but does it work for your team? there is no way this trade would get the veto, unless you are in one of THOSE leagues. i've been in leagues where they vote against everything.
a better question would be should i make this trade & then list your team so we can see your needs.
SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT - TJ is the man getting all the looks in Cincy BUT, Johnson's playing status could effect his numbers. he's getting all the yards & TDs w/ CJ taking double coverage. don't fool yourself, the attention CJ gets is the reason TJ is a fantasy stud. if Johnson doesn't play, who do you think is going to get all that attention?
Chris Henry should be back this week & may benefit the most if Ocho Cinco can't play.
2007-11-06 21:14:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take TJ he is always consistent and Chad Johnson is out for a little bit- easy matchup coming up so hes due for a breakout game. Drew is splitting with Taylor and Jags are going downhill.
2007-11-06 21:14:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by JTOWN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, maybe TJ for Jones-Drew and another average player
2007-11-06 21:04:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on if your gettin TJ then heck yeah take it!!! if not no way i'd take it
2007-11-07 01:31:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by jim c 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
straight up? absolutely not if you ask me housh is way better
2007-11-06 20:58:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lucky 7's 3
·
0⤊
0⤋