The life of an unborn child? There is clearly something wrong here.
How do women live after having abortions? There are so many avenues these days, especially in the West, where women can get help, I just can't imagine how someone could have an abortion.
There's even adoption!
2007-11-06 11:58:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Drew has no clue obviously.
Firstly, a baby does communicate with its surroundings, it communicates with the mother, and it can hear outside the womb from 5 months.
Also, a woman who has become pregnant -- well, her body is obviously then ready, or else she wouldn't get pregnant in the first place.
2007-11-06 12:11:43 · update #1
BINGO it is not her life it is an innocent creation of GOD
2007-11-06 12:01:49 · answer #1 · answered by sissy 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
When you die, how does your soul leave your body?
With the last breath it takes
When does the soul enter the body?
The question you are asking doesn't have an answer, and i am sorry that you will never know.
However it is a matter of personal opinion as to when life begins, and if a fetus is really alive.
With medical equipment, we can keep a body alive medically, but once all functions cease naturally, that person is no longer alive, the body is just being kept from decay. A mother's body is that machine until the fetus is viable, and that is where you get the abortion argument when does life begin.
I had an abortion, and i am fine. does that mean that i am heartless and a horrible person, no it doesn't. but it does mean that i made my own decision based on my beliefs and background.
and what about all of those children that the state has to pay for in Foster care? where are those families that so desperately want children? or is it that they only want "brand new"??
Maybe i have given you some stuff to think about'!!!
2007-11-07 14:07:31 · answer #2 · answered by stacielb06 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That's how it is because that is the law and according to law, a mother has the right to kill her child in certain situations. If it wasn't legal, women would go to great lengths to kill their underdeveloped children, even if they killed themselves in the process. The child is so underdeveloped that there will never be a ubiquitous sentiment that it deserves to live. Most people don't want to admit that they start the first months of their lives as a parasite in their mothers belly, so they just mark the birth day when you come out of your mother as a cute baby. And because people, in general, don't want to be compared to a parasite, they will always look to the right of the woman before they look to the rights of an extremely underdeveloped child.
Plus, have been, and in some cases, still are oppressed all around the world, so, of course, there is no way that any women will let the faceless government into her body, even if there is another human organism inside.
2007-11-07 19:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by Cyesolagniac 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not a life until it comes out of the womb. Sure it might be alive, but that doesnt mean it has a life. It doesn't have a name. It hasnt ever communicated with another human being. While I think that abortion should be the last option, women should have the right to get an abortion if they want to. Why should a rape victim be forced to carry a child with her for 9 grueling months because she was a victim of sexual assault? What if a young teen who gets pregnant isnt physically capable of having a child? You have to look at the life of the person who is carrying the child too.
2007-11-06 20:05:25 · answer #4 · answered by Drew 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I feel the same way but the government can't necessarily stop women from having abortions. Its a choice that is strictly between a woman and her doctor. If I was pregnant and unable to care for my baby, I would never have an abortion. I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I did.
2007-11-06 20:03:02 · answer #5 · answered by nobodyd 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
A woman has the right to physical autonomy. Period.
"Also, a woman who has become pregnant -- well, her body is obviously then ready, or else she wouldn't get pregnant in the first place." OBVIOUSLY you haven't check both the maternal and the infant death rates in teen pregnancies...
2007-11-07 09:41:06 · answer #6 · answered by halfthebottle 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well in England you don't have clinics you can go to live in to have a baby like in America or help groups for teens to attend and get support. i think its a very hard decision but if you make it before 6weeks (before the heart starts to form) then i don't think its that bad, i personally would´nt have one but i can understand why a person would. it depends on circumstances
2007-11-06 20:05:30 · answer #7 · answered by estrellita 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm pro life too :)
I say everyone deserves a chance at life. It's not the baby's fault at all and it's unfair because you are practically killing someone
2007-11-06 20:04:51 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ mimi ♥ 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
If the child is already very sick then maybe it's ok. That way they don't go through a miserable life.
2007-11-06 20:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by McKenzie 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm pro Life.
2007-11-06 20:01:35 · answer #10 · answered by Love thy neighbour 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Its a womans choice, thats how it is. Get over it and move on.
2007-11-06 20:02:35 · answer #11 · answered by Alana B 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋