why do you think that no video of an airplane from the pentagon on 9/11 has yet to be released by gov.?

Question

and please don't give me a 2 hour lecture on why this is or isn't a conspiracy. I am asking a question . Its simple. There were many recorded tapes showing the incident and the only few images released were not enough to show the plane.

i've seen the video and seen the destruction too. but my question is... why , out of all those dozens of videos, were none released that specifically showed a plane hitting it? do you know how many different camera angles recorded it, we're talking about the pentagon, not some building in the middle of nowhere. the first 3 answers have not yet answered the question.

how many of you people are stupid? didn't you read what i wrote? its a simple question, why can't you just answer a simple question without judging someone you dont' know???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/ i don't wear a damn tin hat either you stupid _____! i never said a cruise missle hit pentagon, i simply am questioning why the video that shows the plane is not released. damn!

Answer 1

some people think the pentagon was a set up. that a bomp was painted and every thing was staged. I'm not really sure, but I'm one of those people that beleaves that the govenment did know about 9-11 as a whole and did nothing about it.

Answer 2

There was footage released.

It only showed blurry image of the plane because security cameras go at 1 frame/sec and the plane was going some 800 feet / sec.

You can see some stills here:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

It's not true that there were "many recorded tapes." Even for WTC tower one, the impact was only caught on a few cameras. On the Pentagon, just 1 or two.

The Pentagon is not a military base, it's an administrative facility with low level security in peace time. They only had one or 2 cameras on any given part of the building (it's the largest building in the world).

I know of no evidence that there were "dozens" of cameras. That would mean 24 or more cameras all aimed at the impact site at the same time. That wouldn't make any sense.

It really doesn't matter one whit since there is utterly overwhelming evidence from dozens of sources that it was a jet. There's no debating it.

Answer 3

The part of the Pentagon which the plane struck contains a lot of classified spaces. The death toll from the service members inside that day reveals a great many who were involved in information technology. Though the section has been rebuilt, its purpose remains.
I lost two people I knew who were on the plane. I went to their funeral. It was a plane which struck the building. Those two people were not riding on top of a cruise missile. AND AFTER SIX YEARS I'M FED UP WITH THE TIN-FOIL HAT CROWD!

Answer 4

Well, I saw a video of SOMETHING exploding in the Pentagon but I never saw a plane. Just like I saw the Super Bowl with Janet Jackson, but doggone, no matter how many times I replay that I see NOTHING but a hand over some material. So maybe the plane and the nipple were made up by conspiracy theorists?

Answer 5

Ok simple answer to a simple question. I also have seen the video and also seen the destruction. Do you need any further proof. I don't think it blew itself up. Ok so how come they found the bits of aircraft and bodies in the building ?

Answer 6

Film's out there, find it.

I've seen the security camera coverage.

You never saw the video of Napoleon either, I'm guessing?

Must just be a plot to defraud the French..

Answer 7

I think that the most likely reason is that there is no footage of an airplane hitting the Pentagon. I don't believe that the damage that was done to that building was consistent with an airliner crashing into it and I don't remember seeing any footage of the fuselage. If you find any pictures of the pictures of the crash site please send it to me. [e-mail]

Answer 8

Who told you that?

My brother knew the crew on flight 77.