English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

I think if he did a good enough job once, he deserves to be an option as long as we need him.

2007-11-06 10:55:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

No they shoulden't. I personally think that presidents( all over the world) are more worried about the money they are making then whats going on in their country. Change could bring a president the actually wanted to do some good for the country.

2007-11-06 10:57:30 · answer #2 · answered by Lagunillo 3 · 0 1

No but I do believe the years should be longer , the first and second terms should be 5 years not 4

2007-11-06 12:32:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, 2 terms and the senate and house should also have term limits.

2007-11-06 10:59:33 · answer #4 · answered by Jan Luv 7 · 1 0

Two terms is enough. FDR was in far too long.

2007-11-06 10:55:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I agree that two terms is plenty.

2007-11-06 10:59:12 · answer #6 · answered by blueyeznj 6 · 1 0

No, we tried that before

2007-11-06 10:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2 0

Ask FDR

The only man to ever do so.

2007-11-06 10:54:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

No

2007-11-06 12:04:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nooooooo......think about our current administration..........

2007-11-06 10:57:40 · answer #10 · answered by N L 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers