I think if he did a good enough job once, he deserves to be an option as long as we need him.
2007-11-06 10:55:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
No they shoulden't. I personally think that presidents( all over the world) are more worried about the money they are making then whats going on in their country. Change could bring a president the actually wanted to do some good for the country.
2007-11-06 10:57:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lagunillo 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No but I do believe the years should be longer , the first and second terms should be 5 years not 4
2007-11-06 12:32:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, 2 terms and the senate and house should also have term limits.
2007-11-06 10:59:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jan Luv 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Two terms is enough. FDR was in far too long.
2007-11-06 10:55:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree that two terms is plenty.
2007-11-06 10:59:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by blueyeznj 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, we tried that before
2007-11-06 10:54:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ask FDR
The only man to ever do so.
2007-11-06 10:54:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No
2007-11-06 12:04:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nooooooo......think about our current administration..........
2007-11-06 10:57:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by N L 6
·
1⤊
2⤋